User talk:Malvenue

"Life's a journey, not a destination." ~ Aerosmith

Warnings
 Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings. Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the [ page history]. [Admin: block | [ unblock] / Info: contribs | [ page moves] | [ block log] | [ block list]]

November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Mark Levin. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the [ page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The edit(s) in question are as follows: --4wajzkd02 (talk) 23:09, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Mark Levin has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Nezzadar  [SPEAK]  04:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

helpme:Thank you for helping me out. Recent edits have not shown an Reason for Edit field as I encountered last week when doing some minor edits, so I gave my reasons on the discussion page. Can you think of any reason why that field would not appear for me when making changes? And thank you for the ~ comment, I had been cutting/pasting my info in after saving the edit. Malvenue (talk) 05:02, 8 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I can't think of any particular reason the summary text box would not appear, except for a temporary glitch. If it happens again, try refreshing the page to see if it comes back.  Also, I notice your query seems to be directed at the previous poster.  When addressing a question to a particular user, you should not use the helpme template, which is intended to get the attention of any user.  Try posting a talkback template to User:Nezzadar's talk page if you want to alert them to your message here.  AJ  Cham  06:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Do you have an "Edit summary" box now instead? This is the same thing as "Reason for edit". Note that the edit summary field does not appear when you start a new section on a talk page though.--Commander Keane (talk) 06:45, 8 November 2009 (UTC)


 * The problem appears to have resolved itself as it hasn't occured now in two weeks. Should I remove this section from my talk page or will the bots do it eventually?

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:24, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Mark Levin RfC Text
Your text currently reads...


 * Are the David Frum and David Brooks quotes referenced at [1] demonstrate notability...

Hopefully you note the problem. JakeInJoisey (talk) 20:00, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I noticed it earlier today but didn't think it worth changing the RFC for a silly grammatical error. Thanks. Malvenue (talk) 20:07, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Very well. BTW, I have removed my "housekeeping" P.S. which I probably should have posted here in the first place.  You might want to consider deleting your response as well. JakeInJoisey (talk) 20:21, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Personal attacks
Hi, if you continue to attack me personally, as you did here, I will request that you be blocked from editing. &mdash; goethean &#2384; 18:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I have made no personal attacks on you and have sourced the personal attacks you have made upon me on the related page for any interested parties to peruse. Unlike you however I did not issue a warning on your talk page and instead let them slide as simply empassioned statements. Perhaps I was incorrect to do so. Malvenue (talk) 19:13, 1 December 2009 (UTC)