User talk:Malvolio80

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 00:23, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Thanks; Remote Viewing
Hey, Malvolio80. Just wanted to thank you for your work on Courtney Brown, and your firm stance on frivolous edits. I've been trying to work on Remote Viewing, but it is really difficult. I want to trash the article and start again, much tighter, easier to read, and balanced, but I know it will just start an edit/revert war. The POV language there is just atrocious, and, (while this is the least of the problems with that article) the writing style is terrible. Keep up the good work! --NightMonkey 18:01, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)

Remote viewing
Keep in mind that everything is recorded in wikipedia, and that if your intent is to help edit and create better articles, that is fine. But if you continue to censor information and frame its content in a way that distorts the truth, you will be held accountable by the wikipedia authority when the time comes and when there is enough history to demonstrate your abusive actions. Then, the article on Courtney Brown will be locked, and no changes will be allowed on the article since this dispute and your censoring of data has lasted long enough.

Remote viewing and life in the Universe is one of the most serious issues in the history of mankind, and your seemingly lack of 'intelligence' in these matters does not justify your actions. If I was you, I would take a closer look at what the intelligence community has been doing in regards to remote viewing, and realize that there is a reason why it was one of the most classified programs whithin the intelligence community.

Remote viewing and the issue of life in the Universe can help to change the world for the better, but I understand if sceptics are skeptical. It is their nature, and I am skeptical myself, this is why I dig deeper than most, I am more skeptical. It is wrong to prevent freedom of information to wikipedia readers, and paint an incomplete picture of research done, and of various points of views. It defeats the mission of wikipedia of providing freedom of information.

To actually write on your main page that you are focused on Courtney Brown will help to show to the wikipedia authorities your true intent in pursuing the distortion of this file. I invite you to consider what you are doing, and consider how your actions fit within the larger context of the future, and to be fair in the way you edit any articles. But you don't have to be fair, you have freewill, it's your choice. --Pierre2012 10:25, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

Your help requested
Hi Malvolio80. I've reached my 2RR on Remote Viewing. The edit history shows it all. Two users, one anon, the other not, are attempting to re-write the first paragraph to add bias. I ask for your review of the edits, and corroberate or dismiss my assessments. Help! :) --NightMonkey 04:21, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Stop the Edit War
your edits of Darkhawk are fueling an edit war. its already implied that "Darkhawk #1" features him in the story being that it is a comic book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.241.64.18 (talk) 17:25, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Dear anonymous stranger, I'm just trying to protect the page from vandalism. You should go to the talk page to argue your case. Thanks! Malvolio80 (talk) 01:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)