User talk:Mama Money

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mama Money/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=User:Mama_Money/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Qcne&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Mama_Money/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Qcne  (talk)  12:40, 15 July 2024 (UTC)


 * I understand that my previous contributions may have appeared promotional. This was not my intention, and I apologize for any misunderstanding. I have since reviewed Wikipedia's guidelines on neutral point of view and notability, and I am committed to adhering to these guidelines in all future edits.
 * I will focus on providing verifiable, neutral, and well-sourced content that aligns with Wikipedia’s standards. Mama Money (talk) 12:28, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi, I am still blocked can I please be unblocked I think it's very harsh to block someone on their first attempt at submitting an article. Please can you reply to my message. Thank you Mama Money (talk) 13:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @Mama Money you did not format the unblock request properly, I have fixed it. An admin will respond.  Qcne  (talk)  19:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Mama Money (talk) 08:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps: To do this, insert the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.
 * 1) Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
 * 2) Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
 * 3) Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
 * 4) Provide a new username.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 12:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

GPTZero has this as 100% AI and it certainly looks like a clear use of AI. Mama Money, if you'd like an admin to consider your unblock request seriously, the first thing to do is write the unblock request in your own words. Admins care about you understanding what you did wrong and expressing what you'd do differently if unblocked, not what text prediction algorithms say. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 06:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)


 * @CoffeeCrumbs I am well where that I have written the draft with promotional intent after being blocked, but I am asking to be unblocked as I feel that is to harsh for being a first time writer on this platform. As I stated before this was not my intention, and I apologise for any misunderstanding I might have caused. I am not being paid to do this but add more context to this platform form my own free will. I am committed to providing verifiable, neutral, and well-sourced content that aligns with Wikipedia’s standards going forward. I will change the the username and will be using this username going forward: [M.M.Y]. I do use a lot of A.I in my articles and will also change that and will add more human written content to give more individual context and information. I thank you for considering my unblocking application. Mama Money (talk) 08:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I do not have authorizations to consider your unblock, I'm only giving you advice to help you possibly get unblocked. You should completely refrain from using large language models for this purpose. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 08:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @CoffeeCrumbs I thank you for the advice and noted! Mama Money (talk) 08:36, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @CoffeeCrumbs Thank you and noted. Can my new request be sent for review to be unblocked. I haven't used any A.I and will refrain from doing so in the future. Mama Money (talk) 08:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)