User talk:Mamalujo/Archive 8

Philosophers critical of the teapot idea have noted that it is a poor analogy which fails because belief in God is distinctly and radically unlike belief in a celestial teapot for a number of reasons, among them that there are many rational reasons for belief in God but none for the teapot.

Reply
Heya, sorry for the delay. Just to be clear - your main concern is that Jayjg said he'd rewrite the page, but he never did? m.o.p 06:43, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, just let me know if there's anything you'd like me to help with. m.o.p  14:53, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Deputy
I am sorry to have reverted our last change, but I think if no one is happy, then we have a stable situation. If another round of reverts starts there, then we will spend effort, but will probably go back to where we are now. May I suggest peace for a while? Thanks. History2007 (talk) 19:10, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

WP:3RR again
Shakespeare's religion --Old Moonraker (talk) 21:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Not to mention disregarding the outcome of the RSN discussion which you yourself initiated. --Old Moonraker (talk) 18:37, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

FYI
Please see – Lionel (talk) 11:08, 11 July 2011 (UTC)