User talk:Mami Mamiso

Welcome
.   HurricaneEdgar    01:17, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Red links
Looking through your edits today, I see that on a number of occasions you have removed the square brackets from perfectly correctly red-linked items. The purpose of the red linkage is to identify items which do not as yet have a wikipedia article written about them, and to serve as an invitation to produce the missing article. If the red link is removed then the probability of a relevant article being written is significantly reduced. Unless a redlink is blatantly unnecessary please do not remove the square brackets. Anthony Bradbury "talk" 14:03, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. Most of your recent edits are blatantly disruptive and have been reverted. Stop removing all the red links from each Wikipedia article you go to. Red links should stay if they are notable enough to warrant their own article, or if a new article will be coming in the near future. Also, stop screwing up the grammar on pages. For example, the grammar for these articles were fine just the way they were before you messed them up. Please note that competence is required in order to edit on Wikipedia. Your recent disruptive edits are frankly unacceptable. If you continue to make disruptive edits, as you did at Tevita, you may be blocked from editing.  Light and Dark2000  🌀 (talk) 14:36, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Ajhenson21&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Ajhenson21. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 15:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)