User talk:ManagementPS

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Patty Schnyder. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. undefined — Bill william compton Talk   16:43, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Patty Schnyder, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. undefined — Bill william compton Talk   16:50, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Patty.schnyder for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. undefined — Bill william compton Talk   16:51, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Patty Schnyder, you may be blocked from editing. undefined — Bill william compton Talk   16:58, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Patty Schnyder, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. undefined — Bill william compton Talk   17:00, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello ManagementPS. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Patty Schnyder, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 17:18, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 17:20, 14 September 2011 (UTC)