User talk:Manav Kaushish Sharma

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia.

I noticed that your user subpage at User:Manav Kaushish Sharma may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your userpage does not violate our guidelines, please leave a note here and we can discuss it. As an alternative, you may add  to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's userpage guidelines. Thank you. Only edited to user page (no other edits made to any article) for advertising purpose. Joydeep (talk) 19:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not a place to promote your business, it's an encyclopedia. I have deleted your user page, as it did not meet our guidelines of acceptable usage. Thanks, henrik  • talk  19:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Manav Kaushish Sharma, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. No more advertising on Wikipedia, please. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Manav sharma


A tag has been placed on Manav sharma, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Best regards,  Cindy  ( talk to me ) 10:45, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Manav sharma, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=489136791 here]. Widefox (talk) 11:02, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Manav sharma. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Widefox (talk) 11:06, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Manav sharma, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=489137447 here]. Widefox (talk) 11:07, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Manav sharma shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Widefox (talk) 12:08 pm, Today (UTC+1)

Blocked
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:14, 25 April 2012 (UTC)