User talk:Mancini237

M DoT Mancini
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of M DoT Mancini, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.reverbnation.com/page_object/page_object_bio/artist_731372.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:04, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of M DoT Mancini


A tag has been placed on M DoT Mancini requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gonzonoir (talk) 08:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, thank you for your interest in Wikipedia and for the article you posted earlier, M DoT Mancini. Unfortunately, it appeared to be substantially the same as ; it may not have been copyright infringement in the usual sense if you helped write the original material, but that page makes a credible assertion of copyright. Wikipedia articles are licensed by WP:CC-BY-SA, a Creative Commons license that allows for redistribution by any third party for pretty much any purpose, including commercial use, without recompense or prior consultation. Please see also Donating copyrighted materials and Requesting copyright permission. If you control the material at that site, the simplest way to release it under a compatible license is simply to put a notice of copyright on the relevant pages. Please be aware, though, that any such release will apply to use and re-use by anyone and everyone, not just Wikipedia; moreover, the article here will be edited and will in time come to no longer reflect the original text. Based on your username, the Conflict of interest policy may also be relevant.
 * There is a secondary concern, in that articles here need to focus on summarizing how topics have been treated in independent reliable sources, such as newspapers, trade publications, and books from respected publishing houses, and should not be unduly self-promoting. Please see Your first article for some more helpful advice on getting into the swing of encyclopedia writing. If you have any questions, would like help with anything, or would just like to stop by for a chat and a spot of tea, please do not hesitate to swing by my talkpage. Happy editing, - 2/0 (cont.) 14:33, 24 November 2010 (UTC)