User talk:Mandrogora

Welcome!


Hello, Mandrogora, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to continue. Some useful pages to visit are:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Questions, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. We're so glad you're here! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 21:42, 25 July 2016 (UTC).

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from First National Pictures into Warner Bros. Studios, Burbank. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 03:00, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Illusions Gaming Company
So, I see you filled in some sources, that's terrific. The problem is that all those sources are other wikis that allow user contributions. See WP:SOURCES. Think newspapers, articles, books, etc. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 01:20, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, I'm RSTech1. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Majesco without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RSTech1 (talk) 11:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I believe your edit was in good faith, but had to roll the edit back again. Please see my comment and response. Edits still need to be based on reliable sources. If you are confident you are correct, then do research, find good quality sources, and cite them when you make edit in the future. RSTech1 (talk) 11:39, 21 November 2016 (UTC)