User talk:Mandyxsmith

April 2013
Hello, I'm Excirial. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Borderline personality disorder with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:19, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Borderline personality disorder with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:23, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Please do not use Ad hominem arguments in Wikipedia, for instance in your edit summary. Stating that edits "appear to have been made by an over-zealous trial watcher of the Jodi Arias murder trial" is an example of such an argument. When explaining why a certain text should be changed, only talk about the text. Thank you. Lova Falk    talk   11:47, 21 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:3RR. One more reversion of Borderline personality disorder, and you risk a block or ban. Even if the information is not "useful", if it's relevant and a real controversy, the material should be in the article. Bearian (talk) 13:15, 22 April 2013 (UTC)