User talk:MangaFerr

December 2022
Thank you for your work. Not all topics are notable (suitable for a stand-alone Wikipedia article). does not cite sources establishing notability, so it may get deleted. A source shows that the article topic is notable when it:


 * contains significant coverage: it addresses the topic directly and in multiple paragraphs of detail. A source with only trivial or off-topic mentions of the subject doesn't count.
 * is a reliable source: it has a reliable publication process, or a suitable expert author (look up the reliability of common sources, or discuss). Newspapers and books usually meet this criteria, company and personal websites usually do not.
 * is independent of the subject: it isn't produced by the article's subject or someone similarly affiliated with it. For example, these are not independent: the subject's press releases, autobiographies, website, and interviews.

If you can find notability-establishing sources, please add them: more than one is needed unless the applicable subject-specific notability guideline states otherwise. Specific questions can be answered live at the Teahouse help forum. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:45, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Nicolina Elrick moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Nicolina Elrick, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). It needs real WP:SECONDARY sources for a BLP. I've sent it to draft where you can work on it, but it can't remain in mainsapce.  scope_creep Talk  10:10, 15 December 2022 (UTC)