User talk:MangoTareeface9

July 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Adrian Zenz, you may be blocked from editing. Super Goose 007 ( Honk! ) 03:24, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

First please stop gaslighting me. The info I used were directly from his own book. I did not create personal analysis but just quoted the book. The book makes mention to an "anti-christian" tolerance campaign and that modern society was becoming incresingly secular and incompatible with the christian faith. It argues that in western countries, the laws that protect homosexuality from discrimination, are doing a lot of harm to the christian faith. That is not personal ansylsis but an objective summary of what the book literally wrote. https://books.google.com/books/about/Worthy_to_Escape.html?id=lRtSQB3HHJcC

I WELCOME you to please report me and let the Arb committee give their official decison on who is the actual bully here and whether my edits were "disruptive" or "constructive" /good faith. MangoTareeface9 (talk) 03:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Disregard the above warning. However, you seem to be involved in a content dispute, so be careful with your edits. Super Goose 007  ( Honk! ) 03:59, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Important notices
—  Newslinger  talk   16:10, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi MangoTareeface9! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! —  Newslinger  talk   16:11, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Use of given names and surnames
Hi! Just a quick note, please use surnames instead of given names when referring to people within articles (e.g. Zenz instead of Adrian in ). From the Wikipedia Manual of Style: After the initial mention, a person should generally be referred to by surname only. Thanks! — MarkH21talk 17:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Sun Yang, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Please beware of WP:SOAPBOX. Normchou   💬 19:09, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

It's not original research. I quoted the Italian exactly on what he wrote and also you had no right to remove the info of all other SUN drug test results within the 2 weeks period of the incident. He been tested regularly and often only day earlier and already finished his main competition of the year. Calling it original research is a false excuse to remove it. MangoTareeface9 (talk) 04:14, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

However my issue was that the Italian judge wasn't condemned for criticising dog eating. He was using racist slurs and you left that out. But I see that you mentioned it so I won't challenge your edit. MangoTareeface9 (talk) 04:18, 6 August 2021 (UTC)