User talk:Mangoguava

Lupe Fiasco
Please stop adding information pertaining to unofficial and/or unreleased material to Lupe Fiasco. This content should not be in article entries per MOS:DISCOG. Your edits are becoming disruptive and may lead to a temporary block. —  Σ xplicit  03:12, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Those guidelines have nothing to do with this entry. Those guidelines pertain to an artist discography which isn't being changed here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mangoguava (talk • contribs) 04:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for responding, but for future replies, please make sure to reply here on your talk page, as I like to keep discussion in one place; I have your talk page on my watchlist. As for the information in Lupe Fiasco, it doesn't belong in the article at all. There is nothing encyclopedic about an unofficial jazz remix from a non-notable producer. Even if it were notable, it would still not belong in the discography, as it's an unofficial release. Those discography guidelines are being applied in Fiasco's article as if it were his discography. —  Σ xplicit  04:27, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Lupe himself has noted it. Therefore, I think it has encyclopedic context on this page. http://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=5&topic_id=2070951&mesg_id=2070951

There are two problems with that: forums are not reliable sources and your view does not override other views. Fact is, it's still not encyclopedic. Whether or not Fiasco has acknowledged its existence really doesn't matter, as the content adds no new, useful information to the article that adds to the reader's comprehension. —  Σ xplicit  05:06, 29 April 2009 (UTC)