User talk:Mangos2008

Please do not remove sourced information from Terry McAuliffe without discussing it on the talk page. You clearly don't feel the material should be in the article, but you must justify its removal so we can come to a consensus; see Dispute resolution. Thanks! Meelar (talk) 15:57, 12 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Listen, if you refuse to discuss this and insist on removing sourced statements without justification, you can be blocked from editing. Thank you. Meelar (talk) 15:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

How to use a talk page
OK, no problem. The usual method is just to go to Talk:Terry McAuliffe and edit that page directly. You can create a new heading on the page where we can discuss the material by typing ==New Heading== and adding your comments there. I am notified whenever someone changes that page, so I will reply there. Hope this helps! Meelar (talk) 15:43, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Terry McAuliffe
Hi Mangos2008, Could you please join the discussion at Talk:Terry McAuliffe before making any more edits to the article? There's something of an edit war underway, and having additional reverts on the page just fans the flames -- especially when those reverts are not accompanied by an edit summary. Thanks -- Shunpiker (talk) 01:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- Shunpiker (talk) 21:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)