User talk:Manha Sylvia

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Gianotten (January 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Gianotten and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Gianotten, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:David_Gianotten Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Curb_Safe_Charmer&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:David_Gianotten reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Gianotten (January 18) @Curb Safe Charmer
@Curb Safe Charmer thank you for your edits to Draft:David Gianotten. I am not sure about your comments and am seeking your advice.

The sources that I have included have all been published by third parties.

- Design Trust (20 March 2020). "International Advisory Council". Retrieved 18 January 2021. (Design trust is an independent NGO based in Hong Kong)

- Gianotten, David (26 Feb 2013). "Hier is een architect heus geen superstar" (Interview) (in Dutch). Interviewed by Henny de Lange. Retrieved 8 December 2021. (Trouw is a widely read Dutch newspaper, and an article, even interview, published there should be credible? I assume the journalist has also fact-checked?)

- Wiles, William (16 October 2008). "Roombeek Culture Cluster". ICON. Retrieved 18 January 2021. (ICON is an important design magazine, thus a reliable source?)

- Van Schoor, Steven (2014). 'Ik ben geen ik' - de verdwijntruc van Rem Koolhaas ['I am not me' - Rem Koolhaas's disappearing act] (PDF). Masterscriptie, Ghent University (Thesis) – via Universiteitsbibliotheek Gent. (This is a published thesis by a student researcher. in the article, interviews with Gianotten have been quoted as reliable sources too.)

- Wong, Olga; Chow, Vivienne (4 January 2011). "Architectural firm OMA moves Asian HQ from Beijing to Hong Kong". Retrieved 8 December 2021. (South China Morning Post is the largest English language newspaper in Hong Kong. Assuming that the journalists have factchecked, and the article with quotes from Gianotten is reliable?)

- "Gianotten named managing partner-architect of OMA". Construction Week (Press release). 9 December 2014. Retrieved 18 January 2021. (This is not a press release, but a news item published by a trade publication. Assuming that the info has been fact checked?)

- Gosavi, Ritu. "Design for a five-story office building in Amsterdam revealed by OMA / David Gianotten". Rethinking The Future. Retrieved 8 December 2021. (This is not an interview. it is recent, and covers the work of Gianotten rather extensively)

- Gianotten, David. "Conversations with Leading Professionals" (Interview). Interviewed by Aaron Prinz. Retrieved 8 December 2021. (AR is one of the most important platforms for architects. assuming what they publish is credible?)

I have included these sources based on my knowledge that I got from journalism school and phd studies. I am hoping to understand why the sources included above are not credible. Would be wonderful to have your feedback, and thanks so much for all your input. Manha Sylvia (talk) 00:43, 19 January 2022 (UTC)