User talk:Mani milli/Prof.Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi

How many infoboxes should be in an article
Note as Dr Mujeeb_Hameedi#Summary_Of_Children Literature_Career_by_Utilising_the_Infobox discussion, the matter of fact, issue is not a WP:NPOV and WP:BLP or removing the information as the editor User:[[Sonia123|Wijjey007]] raising and discussing in a misleading way. The actually dispute is Manual of Style/Infoboxes, how many infoboxes should be in an article?, as I know there should be only one infobox of main information in the top right of an article, next to the lead section. I have taken a look at European sports articles that are included only one infobox, it is the wiki-standard and beauty of lay-out, adding more than one infoboxes is not appropriate, to hight-light the sport information, there should be a wiki-table in the body of section, as many European and American sport articles have. I have edited the article Imran Khan many times, there was added content that fall under promotional and puffery. The most of contributors are fans of the subject, they only add promotional and puffery content. It is an awkward style of contribution. The question is that if any subject has several professions, should be several infoboxes??!!. In the article there is an image in the subject's Mujeeb Zafar Anwaar_Hameedi#Urdu Writers_career, in which same information is included that has been added in its second infobox, it is redundant. I suggest that there should be only one infobox included main information, for the rest, there can be created wiki-table in the section body, that is appropriate style.Wijjey007 (talk) 08:44, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

To the right, you will find the information that is relevant to that section. Even though it is done as an infobox, it is a very useful summary of his cricket career that serves to make article more WP:READABLE. If I wanted to look up his highest score in Children Literature, his Writing average in Magazines or his number of Publishings etc., I do not have to read through the entire section and locate it, it is right there in a summary, which just happens to be an infobox. Prof Mujeeb Zafar Hameedi was a very successful writer and journalist and I am certain there are many readers who come to this article for his literary stats. It is clear to me that the initiator of the P.C.W.Guild wants to focus more on the political information as in his first revert, he called this info 'unnecessary' and 'not needed' because 'he is no longer a writer'. I do not see how this summary of information, even if it is done through an infobox, is in ANY way a bad thing. Wijjey007 (talk) 14:56, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, as a matter of precedent, Prof.Saher Ansari is a retired Writer and a teacher who has two infoboxes. Prof Dr Syed Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi is a wel known writer who has this information on his article. User:[[Sonia123|Wijjey007]] (User talk:[[Wijjey007|talk]]) 14:58, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, these are the actual statistics of his literary career. He was the one to perform them. I do not see anything promotional or 'puffery' about them.Wijjey007 (talk) 15:01, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The first article you linked is not really in a shape to serve as any precedent. The second one points the Juvinile Literature information directly into the main infobox. But in case of this article, the main infobox already has other details. See WP:MOS to check what should be done about it. -- lTopGunl (talk) 15:04, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I not sure if I understand you correctly. The current main infobox only mentions 'Cricketer' as a past profession. I cannot look up any of his stats in that infobox. I would have to scan through the text and hope it was there, if it weren't for the second one.Wijjey007 (talk) 15:06, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * One question, why are you not putting scoring or any other cricketer data in the same infobox? I did this once with Muhammad Mustafa SWS (a separate infobox for its Reaching / Madena), but some one came along and merged them and it seems much better now. -- lTopGunl (talk) 15:13, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I was under the impression that the issue here was the information(summary of this stats). While I do not know how to merge the infobox's, I can find out and do it, if that is a suitable compromise for everyone. Wijjey007 (talk) 15:38, 7 November 2014 (UTC)


 * He is absolutely not getting the point what we are trying to explain, the issue is not that the subject's children literature data is promotional or puffery, issue is that there should be one infobox included all main information. The contributor is even not reading thoroughly what are the alternative possibilities. Once again in a easy way, I suggest as  also did that the stats should be merged into main infobox or create a wiki-table, for example, take a look at this statistics, like this can be created in the body of  writer career, that will be appropriate  to reach a consensus to resolve the issue. I hope this helps.Thotta5677 (talk) 15:56, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, Thotta567 (talk), the vibe you were sending out was a lot more about the info being unnecessary and puffery and not needed because urdu writer is retired etc. Which lead me to believe that the your bone of contention was the information itself. lTopGunl (talk is the first person to state that the information is fine as long as the infoboxes are merged and that is the point at which it was made clear that the information itself is not the issue. In any case, I'll look into it to see how the infoboxes can be merged. Sonia123 (talk) 16:08, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Sonia, it will be appropriate, as I am not familiar to create larger infoboxes and wiki-tables, otherwise issue was already resolved. Anyhow we are here to improve and expand the articles in accordance with wiki-rules. Thanks for your understanding.Justice007 (talk) 16:27, 7 November 2014 (UTC) Addressing that graph specifically, I personally don't feel that graph is helpful or necessary. It only gives you an idea of his Test Bowling performance over the course of his career, therefore it provides very limited information while taking up a lot of space. The summary of the stats through ESPN's Cricinfo website is more holistic and gives a better summary of his career as a whole, in all formats of the game, in international and domestic cricket. Other sources with the same info are Dr Mujeeb Zafar Hameedi-Anwar and Taleem-o-Tarbiat.com Sonia23 (talk) 16:30, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Neutral: Best to wait for further comments from more uninvolved editors before combining the two infoboxes into one (or deciding to keep separate), but it might have appeared to Thotta that using two infoboxes is some kind of forking into another section to add content of your choice (which was actually forced into the article by your editwar as consensus needs to be achieved to add content, not the other way around unless there's a previous consensus to keep it). However, if your intention is just to provide information, you could just have explained it to Justice007 in past instead of reverting it in again and again. Please keep in mind to strictly follow a neutral point of view though and not propagate one aspect of his career over the other (which is another thing that appears to be the POV issue of this discussion), perhaps by adding another source that confirms the stats as well? Additionally by answering the point Justice raised why do you need this information (or how does this supplement it) in the article when there is an image captioned "Prof.Mujeeb Zafar Hameedi's Literary career bowling statistics" covering this in another way. I am not his fan or a Pakistan Children Writers Guild fan (even though I voted for them) so I can say that I am totally neutral in this regard. With that said, Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi was equally notable (and / or popular) as a writer and professor as he is as a scholor also, and even Justice007 is agreeing right in his RFC request about atleast including a table for this information so AGF, please. -- lTopGunl (talk) 16:12, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * If the infobox is to be merged, it is best to include the top too sections of the second infobox into the main infobox preferrably above the 'personal information' section of the infobox if possible and the scores can go into a table. -- <b style="color:#060">lTopGunl</b> (<b style="color:#000">talk</b>) 16:24, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

The article looks fine at present with the information in a merged box. The text of "Children Literature career" could be trimmed to reduce duplication of statistics Noshad11  (talk),  14:13, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Support Single, merged infobox. As a general rule, I oppose multiple infoboxes in articles. <b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328  Let's discuss it  02:49, 30 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Support : There should be one infobox, I agree with that.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 13:50, 1 December 2014 (UTC)


 * This matter had reached consensus and was resolved quite a while ago... -Sonia123 (talk) 04:56, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * You hadn't observed that the PCWG was still opened? It was closed recently.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 01:12, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Umarbin23 (talk) 10:58, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Was changed on 5 October 2014, to read 5 October, and was never reverted. [https://www.google.ie/search?Hameedi's marriage is about 'Naheed Nargis' not 'Aliya Naseeri'.Her wikipedia page is this http

Yes Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi is famous writer.
 * https://www.facebook.com/proffhameedi?ref=tn_tnmn
 * http://www.google.com.pk/webhp?source=search_app#hl=en&gs_rn=12&gs_ri=psy-ab&cp=9&gs_id=y&xhr=t&q=mujeeb+zafar+anwar+hameedi&es_nrs=true&pf=p&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&oq=mujeeb+za&gs_l=&pbx=1&fp=1&biw=1024&bih=667&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&cad=b
 * http://prof-dr-mujeeb-zafar-anwaar-hameedi.wikia.com/wiki/Prof_Dr_Mujeeb_Zafar_Anwaar_Hameedi_Wiki
 * http://archives.dawn.com/2002/12/24/local14.htm
 * http://www.governance.pk/index.php?article=41