User talk:Maniiyer728

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Radia tapes controversy, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Radia tapes controversy was changed by Maniiyer728 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.89777 on 2011-01-11T07:02:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:02, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.  The Mi ke •Wassup doc? 07:13, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Radia tapes controversy. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --  Tinu  Cherian  - 10:54, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Radia tapes controversy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Pointillist (talk) 09:11, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for long-term persistent disruptive editing, clearly intended to suppress information unfavourable to a particular person. This disruption has included repeatedly removing sourced information, changing quotes to say something different from what the person quoted said, posting promotional hype, edit warring, and other unacceptable practices. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:04, 22 July 2011 (UTC) JamesBWatson (talk) 13:04, 22 July 2011 (UTC)