User talk:Manish.p

it should be understood that any 'academic' approach towards osho and his work, labeling it as synchretist or whatever is not just insufficient but misleading since the later period of his life and work was solely committed to make real the understanding that the age of past religions is bound to be over, as well as the old spiritual or mystic paths in the way the used to be practiced. the reasons for this are numerous; anyway wht as and is osho's contribution to this is to connect and make available and understanadable not just the old techniques and paths but also to reveal the immense beauty of them and as such to preserve what may well be considered as the true heritage of the whole humankind - and on the other hand to destroy all the misconceptions concerning them; this is why he asked not be connected to any past tradition. the start of 'new spirituality', ie.the effort to create 'a new man', in which the both aspects of life, the spiritual and the material are combined in 'zorba the buddha' should be put as the background of any serious attempt to understand the depth of osho's work; since it also involves every aspect of spirituality, represented in his unique approach of total acceptance. this may also be viewed as 'tantric' since it embraces life in its fullness and richness, leaving absolutely nothing outside, as 'non-spiritual'. when this is throughly understood, only then any meaningful dicussion over the drug-abuses, sexuality, rolls-royces or allged crimes can take place; it is well documented that even many of those very close to him and themselves aware (even awakened) and deeply involved in meditation, have failed to truly understand and appreciate the depth andf height of his work. for to concsiously speak and act in order to lay a milestone for future centuries to approach spirituality in the way that osho did is unique effort in the whole history of humankind and it may be worth considering the vastness of this work is what really killed him at relatively early age. only very few people truly understand this, i believe, since somewhat similar process was and still undertaken in delivering the knowledge and techniques of the old tibet to safety in india and also to expand the teaching in the west. this is the time of the ancient wisdom to leave its centennial abodes in order to help the humankind to survive the extremely important stage of its development to a fully mature specie. and also the axial period where the future of this is actually made on large scale. the insight involved in this should not be even attempted to be contaminated with any academic jargon, even though it is inevitable. as an enlightned presence, it is in my understanding to be considered osho as a mere reflection of the energies surrounding him; the fascist atmosphere of the ranch in usa not only revealed the true state of the spirit of the usa but also did help many people to overcome egoistic questions for the debate over thos times is still very much alive. also the healing effect on both what comes to the traces of nazism and the guilt involved in christianity (and any fundamental approach over the spiritulaity) in the unconscious level, is just to be fully revealed during the coming decades or centuries. as a temporary conclusion it could be therefore stated that whatever happened during the last years of osho's life have deep impact on the collective (un)consciousness of man, even more so if the incidents seem to be extremely controversial. this is acceptance on the enlightned level...? tobecontinued..