User talk:Manish Koli

In response to your feedback
See our startpage

Lectonar (talk) 10:57, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

&#160;

Speedy deletion nomination of MARODA


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on MARODA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Midhart90 (talk) 06:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I had to delete that one, as we already have the article at Maroda, so there would be a redundancy; also, it does not conform to our naming guidelines. Lectonar (talk) 07:56, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Maroda


A tag has been placed on Maroda, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I am One of Many (talk) 07:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, MARODA


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 'MARODA'. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Maroda. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Maroda – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Mkdw talk 07:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Danda nagraja mandir.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Danda nagraja mandir.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/63829727. As a copyright violation, File:Danda nagraja mandir.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Danda nagraja mandir.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Danda nagraja mandir.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Danda nagraja mandir.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Danda nagraja mandir.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. LightGreenApple talk to me  07:26, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Danda Nagraja Temple.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Danda Nagraja Temple.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 08:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Danda nagraja temple.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Danda nagraja temple.jpg, which you've sourced to Panoramio ("Google"?) and Facebook. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:07, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Danda nagraja.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Danda nagraja.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LightGreenApple talk to me  09:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Ownership of articles
Please do not assume ownership of articles such as Maroda. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Please do not change its format again and if possible please remove or replace promoting words and instead of making proclamations about a subject's importance, use facts and attribution to demonstrate that importance. Thank you.-- Ushau97 talk  contribs 12:13, 31 January 2013 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at Maroda. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive and could lead to edit wars and personal attacks, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You can find the manual of style here. There are tons of pages in Wikipedia you can edit. Not just one article. You can find pages to improve at the Community portal. I have reverted your edits at Maroda. To make it a great article see article development page. -- Ushau97  talk  contribs 09:11, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Maroda. Torreslfchero (talk) 09:20, 1 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Well that was obviously not vandalism, and such mistaken accusations often muddy the waters. But having reviewed this, Manish Koli, you are going to need to start responding to some of the comments of other editors.  This is a collaborative project; you can't do whatever you want and ignore other people.  It is important that you work with other people, otherwise I'll have to block this account until you agree to do so, and I don't want to do that to a good faith content creator. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:25, 1 February 2013 (UTC)