User talk:Manishrajput6395

January 2022
Hello, I'm Ab207. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Liger (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not add content sourced to WP:IMDB, as it is considered unreliable for the film's cast. Ab207 (talk) 13:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bhool Bhulaiyaa 2. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Please don't add yourself to cast lists using IMDB as a source. It's user-generated content. Find a review from a reputable critic to use as a source''  Ravensfire  (talk) 03:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Bulandshahr
Hello. Your recent edit to Bulandshahr appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:29, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bulandshahr. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. It was clearly explained above why your addition to Bulandshahr was unacceptable, but you have ignored this, which is disruptive editing - Arjayay (talk) 10:14, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pradeep Rajput


A tag has been placed on Pradeep Rajput requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Ts12rAc talk to me 11:38, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pradeep Rajput
Hello Manishrajput6395,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pradeep Rajput for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 12:33, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Pradeep Rajput for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pradeep Rajput is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pradeep Rajput until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 16:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Pradeep Rajput. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Alphazelf (talk) 23:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Pradeep Rajput, you may be blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:12, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Indefinite block
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for promotional editing. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 04:40, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Sock puppet investigation initiated. Suspected socks are User:Manishrajput203001 and IPs starting with 2409.4050 and 2409.4053. These are SPAs editing about Pradeep Rajput, an article created by Manishrajput6395 David notMD (talk) 17:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)