User talk:Manlyman88

W&W
Hi, so many problems, it's hard to know where to start This is an encyclopaedia, not a fanpage. There is no chance of me restoring the deleted text for the reasons above  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:50, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The article was copied from the band's website, which is not marked as public domain, so it was a copyright violation. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by the organisation, unless they state clearly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that a claim on the talk page that the editor is the owner of the copyright, or has permission, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in jumping through all the hoops that are required.
 * It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: one of the freshest, most exciting electronic dance acts on the scene... globally, has begun to shatter underground clubs, arenas and festivals... As spinners they’ve delivered due damage to club nights and festivals and in 2009 their A-list-hammered track portfolio saw them conclusively tip the ‘next big thing’ scales. Now, in the new decade, W&W are ready to rule... mighty ‘Mustang’. ‘Dome’ & ‘Arena &mdash; and much, much more in the same vein, pure spam.
 * It did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the music notability guidelines. I couldn't find any evidence for them meeting the criteria amongst all the spam, and there are no independent references anyway.