User talk:Mannath123

December 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Nair. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nair&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lady of  Shalott  04:32, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Information added to Wikipedia needs to be verifiable. Please don't add back that huge amount of text to Nair without citing some sources to show where the information is coming from. Lady of  Shalott  05:05, 4 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Please add a new section at the discussion page (Talk:Nair) to explain why large changes to the article should occur. Note that edit warring is prohibited, and anyone exceeding three reversions within 24 hours may be blocked. See WP:3RR. Johnuniq (talk) 06:03, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Nair shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Johnuniq (talk) 06:45, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nair with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 06:58, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Nair with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 07:02, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:09, 4 December 2011 (UTC)