User talk:Mannuk

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Mannuk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Top Jim (talk) 10:38, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style


 * To take Top Jim's point further you can use   where ??? is the information you think needs to be verified.  It won't show to anyone reading the article but will show to anyone who edits it showing them what your thought the shortcomings were. NtheP (talk) 12:00, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Rayo Salahadin Withanage
Hi Mannuk, all the information in the article is from this source which being published by part of the Financial Times is considered to be reliable. Sourcing employment records would be considered original research, which is forbidden. If you have sources which dispute the claims made in this source, then I am all ears, but adding fact isn't much use, when it is included in the reference given. SmartSE (talk) 17:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

name od bank
He doesn't have to work at a bank to be an investment banker he can be self employed, please leave it alone, its getting disruptive. Off2riorob (talk) 17:36, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

So if the press states something its true? Have you not seen the Bernie Madolf scandal? The Sanford Scandal? People who make such vast claims and cant site factual information is the reason why people loose money. I appreciate the fact that Wikipedia is a platform for people posting information so I will leave the matter alone as suggested. I assume there is no work experience otherwise any honest person would post this immediately. Let the public be aware that any investment group who makes such claims of billions and can not show a CV is most likely not the person they claim to be. Mannuk (talk) 18:49, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Wiki just doesn't care about investigating issues, I don't know what your WP:SPA issues are against this living person but imo it would be better if you didn't edit the article any more. WP:COI is a good read also. Off2riorob (talk) 19:01, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article BMB Group, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Top Jim (talk) 14:41, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Did you see the comments and show the link between IZO and BMB. You allowedthe article in reference 14, which clearly states that the CEO of IZO granted the running of the Zakat Fund. This source of article is an internationally know source. THe ceo name is Mr. bin Esa, who is shown in the article in a photo and is the same CEO and photo on the refeence IZO website. Can you correct this please or edit so its included properly. Thank you