User talk:MannyT1629/sandbox

1. Very interesting research. The interview was a good primary source. 2. Your research stays focused and on topic. 3. Information is neutral, not positive or negative. It is based on facts that are unbiased. The information covers many aspects of Filipino cuisine. 4. The information does not offer opinions or make disputable claims. It is unbiased. 5. I would suggest to make the following changes. -	Organization: add headers, bolded or underlined, makes it easier to read -	Add links for some of the foods you mention in interview -	Explain “sofrito” or link it to a Wikipedia article (under Spanish influence category) -	Can you name any specific cooking techniques or customs that were adopted from the Spanish? You only briefly mention it. -	Add links in American influence category -	“Filipino food today has been shaped by history and society, influences from China, India, Arabia are seen through trading.” Confusing sentence to read, fix up the grammar. Make two sentences? 6. No. Our articles are unrelated. Tbookbinder Tbookbinder (talk) 16:16, 25 October 2019 (UTC)