User talk:MannysMyName/Archive 2

PlayStation 2
Hello Railer-man. I noticed that you have the Playstation 2 up for GAN. I've noticed that it has tags in the article that would prevent it from becoming a Good Article, as well as you have never edited the article. I would suggest that you should withdraw the nomination for now and work on the page so that it would meet the Good article criteria. GamerPro64 (talk) 16:55, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of PlayStation 2
The article PlayStation 2 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:PlayStation 2 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:20, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No, I totally understand. Thanks for notifying! Railer-man (talk) 00:53, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Me again
Railer, I have noticed nominated South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut for GAN. Now, let me just say that you should withdraw the nom. Like your last nominations, this will be quick failed. GamerPro64 (talk) 22:02, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I read the review, and am now finding sources. I'm not discouraged, and I'm not giving up. Thanks for notifying! Railer-man (talk) 18:53, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Cyborg Kuro-chan
Could you please post here about what you think needs to happen with Cyborg Kuro-chan so that it can meet the good article criteria? --Malkinann (talk) 04:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, saw you'd attempted to reopen the good article reassessment for Cyborg Kuro-chan. Articles cannot be indefinitely listed at GAR/GAN until they are GA-quality.  Please post on the article talk page what you think needs to happen before the article can meet the good article criteria, and when they are done, seek a B-class assessment from the anime and manga wikiproject here.  A recently-acquired B-class assessment can only help a good article nomination. Opening a peer review may also prove worthwhile, as it attracts help and can tell you what further needs to be done to have a successful GA nomination. --Malkinann (talk) 00:06, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Really!?
You added Pokemon Black and White to GAN? Its not even out yet! It will get a quick-fail. GamerPro64 (talk) 00:33, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Really? You did it again? Sure, it has new features and plot now, but it still needs more to be combed through and the reception section to be filled. Wait until the release in NA, when it gets reception. Plus, I am pretty sure that only major contributers to the article are allowed to nominate it. There is no rush to get GA. Pokémon HeartGold and SoulSilver was released in NA over half a year ago and it just got a GA review. Blake (Talk·Edits) 02:34, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Just letting you that the article failed its GAN again. GamerPro64 (talk) 21:38, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CartmanvsKyle.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:CartmanvsKyle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:29, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kurochannosuit.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Kurochannosuit.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Kurovol1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Kurovol1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Malkinann (talk) 19:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Cyborgkurochan.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Cyborgkurochan.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:19, 21 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Malkinann (talk) 19:19, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Terrance and Phillip in Not Without My Anus/GA1
Hi, I reviewed the article, and have a few minor concerns. C T J F 8 3 chat 02:28, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * 2 things still need fixing before I can pass it. C T J F 8 3  chat 20:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pokemon Black Boxart JP.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Pokemon Black Boxart JP.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:PP7Box.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PP7Box.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Thought you deserved this :)

 * Wow, thanks!!!! I can't believe it!! My own barnstar!! Railer-man (talk) 04:13, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Sonic Colors GAN
Just some issues I think might be brought up. The lead section should probably be expanded, and the last sentence of the Plot section should probably be merged/rewritten. It looks odd all on its own. Thanks, Blake (Talk·Edits) 04:30, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. Take a look! Railer-man (talk) 17:03, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Are you still working on my concerns? I'd like to be appraised on the review page. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 21:36, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Edit summaries
I just wanted to say thankyou for this edit summary - the juxtaposition made me laugh. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:41, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

GAN nominations
Please do not start review pages. If you have comments to make use the note parameter of the GAN template or leave a message on the article talk page. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:51, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut
The article South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut for eventual comments about the article. Well done! GRAPPLE  X  18:37, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

WHY???
Its been a while since I did this. You added Crash Bandicoot (video game) to GAN but you haven't edited it yet. Also, User:Cat's Tuxedo is the main editor on it. Have you contacted him before submitting it to GAN? GamerPro64 03:47, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Talk:420 (Family Guy)/GA1
Hi Railer-man! I made some comments on the review of 420 (Family Guy), the article you nominated. Have a look! Queenieacoustic (talk) 11:52, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cyborg Kuro-chan
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Cyborg Kuro-chan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. -- Cirt (talk) 03:02, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Brian's Got a Brand New Bag/GA1
Check out the GA review. :D 89119 (talk) 21:09, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

420 Commentary
It's finally done! Go to my userpage, go down to "Sandboxes" and press "/asdas SANDBOX". If there's any problem, just ask. Good luck! Queenieacoustic (talk) 12:11, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks!! Railer-man (talk) 17:52, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

FG
FYI there are unsourced claims at Stewie_Kills_Lois/Lois_Kills_Stewie C T J F 8 3  20:22, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Which ones? Railer-man (talk) 20:25, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The ones without references after them, lol.


 * During dinner the Sea Captain recalls the time when he witnessed the Northen Lights. This story is very simmilar to Lord Asriel's expedition to the North in The Golden Compass, which was released less than a month after this episode first aired.


 * The cliff-hanger ending to Part I contains the same dramatic music and on-screen "To be continued" font as Star Trek: The Next Generation's third season cliffhanger, "Best of Both Worlds, Part I".


 * Plus, I'd put them in paragraph form and add better flow, rather than separate sentences. C T J F 8 3  20:28, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I couldn't find sources, so I just removed them. Railer-man (talk) 20:34, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok C T J F 8 3  20:44, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Would you be willing to review the GA nomination? Railer-man (talk) 01:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Baby Not on Board/GA3
Hey, I reviewed this article a week ago and there seem has been no response in that time. I am therefore failing the article at this time; you're welcome to renominate once you have worked on the issues I have raised. I'd be willing to offer another review for you if you contact me when you renominate. J Milburn (talk) 14:41, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Baby Not on Board GAN re
Hi Railer-Man! Sorry for the late response, but I've been kinda busy lately. Anyways, I saw you've nominated Baby on Board. Unfortunately, I do not own the DVD in which the episode appears, but even if I did, I would probably not be able to write another transcript. Just remember how long it took to transcribe 420. It stole a lot of my time, surprisingly, since I thought transcribing the commentary would be quiet quick. Turns out that is not the case. Sorry, but I won't do transcriptions anymore. Besides, the volume DVDs are pretty cheap! :) Queenieacoustic (talk) 15:42, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

420
Hello, just thought I'd tell you that I've reviewed the article 420 (Family Guy)'s GAN and I've suggested a few changes be made. Thanks  That Ole Cheesy Dude  ( Talk to the hand! ) 17:12, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Your Opinion
Would you please give your opinion on the FA Topic Drive in the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Family Guy. Pedro J. the rookie 23:16, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Sonic Colors/GA2
Hey, I offered this review over a week ago; I was just wondering whether or not you had seen it. J Milburn (talk) 23:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I gave you a chance. You're welcome to renominate once you have dealt with the issues I raised. J Milburn (talk) 21:13, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Business Guy/GA1
Hey, I reviewed Business Guy and it is currently on hold NoD&#39;ohnuts (talk) 19:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC)NoD'ohnuts

Orphaned non-free image File:AtsumeteKirby.jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:AtsumeteKirby.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:25, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
 R uby  comment!  16:38, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Quagmire's Baby
Hi Railer-man, as an uninvolved editor, I reverted User:GageSkidmore's reversion and reopened up the GA nomination. Personally, I agree with you that the article "Quagmire's Baby" is ready for a GA review and should get a chance for one. (By the way, as much as I'd love to review the article myself, I can't. 'Cause I'm busy with college, and even if I reviewed this I might be biased in your favor because I too love FG. XD) Anyways, best of luck with your GA! 89119 (talk) 08:28, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks much! Railer-man (talk) 22:24, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

March 2012
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Super Smash Bros. does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Salvidrim!  03:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Railer-man/Super Railers
User:Railer-man/Super Railers, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Railer-man/Super Railers and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Railer-man/Super Railers during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:28, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Babynotboardon55.png
Thank you for uploading File:Babynotboardon55.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 10:52, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Babynotboardon55.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Babynotboardon55.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 12 October 2012 (UTC)