User talk:Manoj Prabakaran S

Welcome!
Hello, Manoj Prabakaran S, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Manoj Prabakaran S, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content protocols, and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are struck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Praxidicae (talk) 14:02, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Manoj Prabakaran S


A tag has been placed on Manoj Prabakaran S, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 14:02, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Manoj Prabakaran S


A tag has been placed on User:Manoj Prabakaran S requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BEAMALEXANDER!,  talk  11:42, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because, this page is about me and i accidentally made a request to delete. So i am contesting this deletion.

Indic script
- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Poonamallee, and other articles, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 14:53, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Poonamallee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. WP:NOINDICSCRIPT was explained to you above, you may not have known about it before, but as you now do you deliberately broke it - Arjayay (talk) 15:03, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Poonamallee, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 15:04, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Poonamallee. - Arjayay (talk) 15:05, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Your recent editing history at Poonamallee shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''I get that you probably don't agree with WP:NOINDICSCRIPT, but that is the consensus on Wikipedia, meaning you need to follow it. Stop edit-warring, stop making edits against consensus.''  Ravensfire  (talk) 17:02, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Please respond that you've seen these warnings and will follow WP:NOINDICSCRIPT.  Ravensfire  (talk) 17:04, 14 June 2020 (UTC)