User talk:Manojslg

Nonsense of London racer destruction madness
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on London racer destruction madness, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because London racer destruction madness provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting London racer destruction madness, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 14:31, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Aaoge jab tum
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Aaoge jab tum, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.indicine.com/movies/bollywood/aaoge-jab-tum-jab-we-met. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Aaoge jab tum
A tag has been placed on Aaoge jab tum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Booglamay (talk) 16:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Bharat Bijlee, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Bharat Bijlee appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Bharat Bijlee has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Bharat Bijlee and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Bharat Bijlee with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Bharat Bijlee.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Improbcat (talk) 14:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

March 2020
Your addition to Sikkim has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:24, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Crossroads -talk- 03:13, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Personal essays
Thanks for your interest in Wikipedia. Your interest in sharing your knowledge on topics of Domestic violence and Fountain pens is certainly welcome, but only to the extent that your additions are reliably sourced WP:RS and cited WP:CITE and not already in the article. I suggest you read WP:RS and your contributions are more likely to stick. I wonder if you read the articles before you added your essays. --David Tornheim (talk) 05:41, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:What you don't know about Tea


The page Draft:What you don't know about Tea has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4055352/pdf/nihms585940.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review — Diannaa (talk) 14:41, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Tea, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. ... also WP:PROMO about regional Indian teas. Zefr (talk) 15:03, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at History of tea in India, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 14:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Moa
Hi Manojslg: I've undone your addition to the bird article, because that level of detail on one group of birds isn't appropriate for a general bird article. Please feel free to ping me if you have any questions about this. MeegsC (talk) 10:52, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

November 2022
Your edit to Prawn cracker has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. SimLibrarian (talk) 05:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion, as you did at Temi Tea Garden. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)