User talk:Manolios5

September 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Doxa Arvanitochoriou has been reverted. Your edit here to Doxa Arvanitochoriou was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/pages/Doxa-Arvanitochoriou/127313947349995) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Andreas Mastrandreas


A tag has been placed on Andreas Mastrandreas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Shirt58 (talk) 12:36, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George Manias


The article George Manias has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Guillaume2303 (talk) 15:17, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of George Manias


A tag has been placed on George Manias requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Guillaume2303 (talk) 15:18, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Giannis Sofilas


A tag has been placed on Giannis Sofilas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Guillaume2303 (talk) 15:20, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Doxa Arvanitochoriou


A tag has been placed on Doxa Arvanitochoriou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Guillaume2303 (talk) 15:21, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kyriakos Zagoras


A tag has been placed on Kyriakos Zagoras requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Guillaume2303 (talk) 15:21, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dimitris Pepis


A tag has been placed on Dimitris Pepis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Guillaume2303 (talk) 15:21, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kassos Local League


A tag has been placed on Kassos Local League requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Guillaume2303 (talk) 15:23, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kassos Local League


A tag has been placed on Kassos Local League requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Guillaume2303 (talk) 10:51, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Doxa Arvanitochoriou


A tag has been placed on Doxa Arvanitochoriou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Guillaume2303 (talk) 10:52, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Inappropriate pages
Please stop creating/re-creating articles on non-notable persons/clubs. If you continue to repeatedly re-create this stuff, you risk being blocked for disruptive editing. Thanks. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 10:54, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Kassos Local League for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kassos Local League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kassos Local League until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Guillaume2303 (talk) 11:34, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Kassos Local League. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Guillaume2303 (talk) 13:58, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Doxa Arvanitochoriou for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doxa Arvanitochoriou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Doxa Arvanitochoriou until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Kosm  1  fent  13:48, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Kassos Local League, you may be blocked from editing. Guillaume2303 (talk) 14:46, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Kassos Local League, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Guillaume2303 (talk) 15:20, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:17, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Why?
I created 2 pages ("Doxa Arvanitochoriou" and "Kassos Local League") and the administrators deleted them again and again! Why? Did I do something in a wrong way?? Manolios5 (talk) 17:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello, your account has been blocked indefinitely by an administrator. The reason for this is listed at the bottom of this page. Alex J Fox|undefined (Talk) (Contribs) 19:16, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Question for administrator


--Manolios5 (talk) 17:30, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * You are blocked because you kept on posting pages that you were told were unacceptable. A league on an island the size of Kassos is very unlikely to be notable, and the players all fail WP:ATHLETE as they are amateur and have no other notability. I'm sorry, but these are our policies. You were warned about this - why did you ignore the warnings and repost the same things? We don't delete articles just for fun. Ignoring warnings is regarded as disruption because it causes the administrators and patrollers so much more work. You were also invited to the Teahouse - a discussion and question area. You could have asked there "Why?" long before you got blocked. You could have asked any of the administrators for more information. YUou may have posted in good faith, not understanding. But we can't tell that from vandalism sometimes - if the user won't say anything or ask a question. Peridon (talk) 19:45, 17 September 2012 (UTC)


 * OK I understand. But, if a person is an amatuer athlete, is not an athlete at all? And if a team is an amateur team, isn't a team at all? Why is that distinction in your policy? Because of the small size of our island, we haven't the right to write for our sport history in wikipedia? This is unjust and sad for us. Manolios5 (talk) 11:42, 18 September 2012 (UTC)


 * We can't list everyone and everything. A year or so back, we had someone writing about a football league on an island. When you looked at it, there were two teams, with three players each. (And the oldest player was about 11 years old.) OK, you're bigger than that. But we have to draw a line somewhere. Professional or amateur - that's easy to work out. Amateur can still get in, but only if they are very notable. People like Chris Chataway were amateur, but they are well known. I'm afraid that you and your league are not yet well known. Some day, maybe. But perhaps not. If you enjoy playing the game, why worry? Peridon (talk) 13:28, 18 September 2012 (UTC)


 * I worry because there are thousands of Kassian people (of first, second and third generation) in all over the world (USA, Australia, South Africa etc) and wikipedia is the only way for them to know the sport history of their island. May I am wrong, but I am really disappointed by this progress. Manolios5 (talk) 15:01, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Unblock

 * Given that you will not be allowed to write about your amateur league or its players, what do you want to write about? Please note that comments made above will almost certainly also apply to local amateur leagues in other sports.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:04, 20 September 2012 (UTC)