User talk:Manonkappelhof

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thrombus perviousness has been accepted
 Thrombus perviousness, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! TeaDrinker (talk) 18:47, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Thrombus_perviousness help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thrombus perviousness
Thanks for your work! It is likely that people might search for the article you just wrote under the following terms? (These were the terms I checked to see if Wikipedia already had an article on the topic.). If any of them likely have the same meaning (or if there are others), let me know and I will create a redirect for them to the Thrombus perviousness article. Thanks again! --TeaDrinker (talk) 18:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Thrombotic perviousness
 * Thrombus lucency
 * Thrombus radiodensity
 * Thrombus radiolucency
 * Thrombotic lucency
 * Thrombotic radiodensity
 * Thrombotic radiolucency


 * Thank you very much for your quick response! The terms you mentioned are (to my knowledge) not used in relation to this topic, however the following terms are:
 * Thrombus permeability
 * Occult antegrade flow
 * Clot porosity
 * Thrombus porosity
 * Would it be possible to create a redirect for these terms? --Manonkappelhof (talk) 08:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Certainly! Thanks again for the work! Let me know if there's anything else I can help with. --TeaDrinker (talk) 21:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC)