User talk:Mansemat

Consort articles
Hi! I noticed you've been doing a lot of work on the consorts of the Nine Hells. It would be helpful if you started adding a "References" section as well. You can find information on formatting at WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons. Thanks,--Robbstrd 00:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I have just added the references and written some additional information. I see you are a specialist of Greyhawk so if anything seems incorrect to you please let me know. Thanks Mansemat


 * Where are you getting the additional information for the consort articles (such as Cozbi being slain by Malarea)? I'd be interested in seeing it. Could you put it in the reference sections or external links, please? Thanks.--Robbstrd 22:07, 21 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Forumish stuff my bad! Removed it.Mansemat

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Cozbinaer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cozbinaer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cozbinaer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 21:07, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Lilis (Dungeons & Dragons) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lilis (Dungeons & Dragons) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lilis (Dungeons & Dragons) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 12:07, 29 October 2016 (UTC)