User talk:Manser.ryan

Notability of Edith Covensky
Hi Manser.ryan. I am concerned that Edith Covensky does not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline, which is used to determine if a topic is eligible for a stand-alone Wikipedia page. For a topic to be considered notable, it must have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. You've included several sources in the article; however, I don't think any of them establish Covensky's notability. For example, this is not independent because it's from an institution where she works; this is not reliable because it allows for user-generated content; and this is not significant coverage since it is simply a listing of her works. The other sources have similar issues. Are you aware of any reliable, independent sources (e.g., reviews of her poetry in well-established publications) that you could add to the article? As it presently stands, the article is at risk of being deleted. I would also like to ask: Do you personally know Covensky or are you professionally connected with her in any way? – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 02:37, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Edith Covensky moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Edith Covensky, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please try to fix the citations with appropriate template (cite). You can work safely in your draft and move to mainspace after the issues get fixed. This will prevent the article from the deletion. Thank you.  PA TH  SL OP U  05:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edith Covensky has been accepted
 Edith Covensky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  PA TH  SL OP U  09:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Edith_Covensky help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Ways to improve Edith Covensky
Hello, Manser.ryan,

Thank you for creating Edith Covensky.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Please fix the issues mentioned in the article."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 PA TH  SL OP U  09:03, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Thanks for creating Edith Covensky.

User:Path slopu while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 PA TH  SL OP U  09:05, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Edith Covensky for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edith Covensky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Edith Covensky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:17, 24 February 2020 (UTC)