User talk:Manson48

Welcome
{| width="100%" style="background:transparent" {| width="100%" cellpadding="2" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"
 * style="width: 50%; border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|
 *  Hello,, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

what book are you writing? Carmelmount (talk) 13:33, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

The title of the book is: 32 Degrees West. A preview of the book is available @ http://www.myspace.com/96926272/blog Manson 20:31, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

More threats, you guys are really good at that. Block me, I have a whole list of alternative proxies. I've been on this site for several years, if that's the way you treat those you disagree with, so be it. Manson 10:20, 17 February 2012 (UTC)


 * You miss the point. I don't disagree with the idea that religion has been one of the most destructive forces. It's your behavior in removing another editor's comments and using a talk page as a forum that I disagred with. Dougweller (talk) 12:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

I did not intentionally delete anyones edits. I simply hit the undo button when someone deleted one of mine. Manson 21:31, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. To contest this block, please email me or place on your page, including an explanation why you feel you should be unblocked. - Rklawton (talk) 01:14, 18 February 2012 (UTC) Don't really care. Like I said I've got alternate proxies and I'll edit where I see fit, when I see fit. Good night! Manson 21:35, 18 February 2012 (UTC)


 * And you'll be reverted as your edits with this account have been reverted. I don't know why you think that will change. Dougweller (talk) 21:54, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Extended block to cover e-mail and talk page. User has given no indication of having a clue. Rklawton (talk) 03:23, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Sock list

 * User:50.51.40.200 Rklawton (talk) 02:22, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * User:50.51.33.241 Rklawton (talk) 13:43, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * User:50.51.73.113 Rklawton (talk) 14:00, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * User:50.51.93.120 Rklawton (talk) 18:01, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * User:50.51.21.123 Rklawton (talk) 02:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * User:50.51.52.156 Rklawton (talk) 03:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * User:50.51.51.22 Rklawton (talk) 03:54, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * User:98.30.191.76 Rklawton (talk) 12:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * User:184.58.124.162 Rklawton (talk) 01:22, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * User:JuSlayer Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Speaking of getting a clue...
We're watching all the articles you've edited. If you edit them in the same way, we'll catch you and block your account without hesitation. Of course, you can edit these articles appropriately to fool us and likely "get away with it" - but then who has learned a lesson on how to behave: us or you? Of course, you could edit a new set of articles outside the areas you've shown an interest in - but the same principle applies. Behave like an ass, and you'll be blocked, or learn your lesson and behave like a decent human being and "get away with it." Or just teach us a really BIG lesson and don't edit at all. So tell me wise guy, who is going to learn a lesson from all of this? Wikipedia is a phenomenal success. If people like you could bring it down, it would have failed years ago. One way or the other, you aren't going to win. Rklawton (talk) 02:14, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

You don't appear to appreciate how trivial it is to deal with your harassment. Rklawton (talk) 13:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)