User talk:Manu84

A tag has been placed on Novalys, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. andy 12:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I didn't delete this - only administrators can do that. What I did was to say that IMHO it ought to be deleted. If you go to the deletion log at Special:Log/delete you can find out who did it and raise the matter with them. andy 14:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Visual Expert
Hi Manu. The source from PBJ is a good start, but it would be better if you cold introduce even more references that attest to the notability of the software. You can read this page to get an idea of what Wikipedia is looking for. The article right now reads a bit like a sell-sheet. Feel free to ask for any advice. ... disco spinster   talk  12:35, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Visual Expert, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Part Deux 16:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)