User talk:Manu Nui o te Tangata Tahi o Aotearoa

January 2023
Hello, Manu Nui o te Tangata Tahi o Aotearoa. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Hobson's Pledge, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.- gadfium 20:56, 9 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Kiora,
 * Who am I speaking with? Gadfium?
 * Thanks for your reply to my edit.
 * Firstly, I am not affiliated with 'Hobson's Pledge' and have not been financially assisted by anyone to edit Wikipedia pages. I was simply searching the web and stumbled across the Wiki page describing 'Hobson's Pledge'. I found the original Wiki page full of extremely politically biased language. And to boot, the author did not even try to appear impartial. Because of this I found the Wiki page UNTRUSTWORTHY.
 * This pricked my interest in 'Hobson's Pledge', so I did some more research into other sources which confirmed what I discerned.
 * I edited the 'Hobson's Pledge' Wiki page to remove the politically biased language, to correct the overly negative tone used, to correct the information so as to fit with other reliable sources, and to remove the partiality of the content expressed in the article.
 * I have used Wikipedia for years, and have been financially supportive on a number of occasions.
 * I find the overtly malevolent language in the original 'Hobson's Pledge' Wiki page offensive and untrustworthy. And I suggest if Wikipedia wants to maintain any resemblance of truth and reliability (which is required when providing a service as a source of information) it needs to remove all levels of bias and partiality from its pages.
 * I strongly recommend that Wikipedia reprimand the original author for their blatant political bias putting a slur on the Wikipedia brand, and revert the 'Hobson's Pledge' Wiki page back to my correct and unbiased edit.
 * I also suggest that if Wikipedia is looking into conflicts of interest to promote truth and transparency, that they look into the affiliations and funding of the original author. From their own language I'm sure you will find that all parties connected with the them are very muchly opposed to 'Hobson's Pledge'.
 * I look forward to your explanation
 * Sincerely Concerned Wikipedia Supporter Manu Nui o te Tangata Tahi o Aotearoa (talk) 20:27, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Kiora,

Who am I speaking with? Gadfium?

Thanks for your reply to my edit.

Firstly, I am not affiliated with 'Hobson's Pledge' and have not been financially assisted by anyone to edit Wikipedia pages. I was simply searching the web and stumbled across the Wiki page describing 'Hobson's Pledge'. I found the original Wiki page full of extremely politically biased language. And to boot, the author did not even try to appear impartial. Because of this I found the Wiki page UNTRUSTWORTHY.

This pricked my interest in 'Hobson's Pledge', so I did some more research into other sources which confirmed what I discerned. I edited the 'Hobson's Pledge' Wiki page to remove the politically biased language, to correct the overly negative tone used, to correct the information so as to fit with other reliable sources, and to remove the partiality of the content expressed in the article.

I have used Wikipedia for years, and have been financially supportive on a number of occasions.

I find the overtly malevolent language in the original 'Hobson's Pledge' Wiki page offensive and untrustworthy. And I suggest if Wikipedia wants to maintain any resemblance of truth and reliability (which is required when providing a service as a source of information) it needs to remove all levels of bias and partiality from its pages.

I strongly recommend that Wikipedia reprimand the original author for their blatant political bias putting a slur on the Wikipedia brand, and revert the 'Hobson's Pledge' Wiki page back to my correct and unbiased edit.

I also suggest that if Wikipedia is looking into conflicts of interest to promote truth and transparency, that they look into the affiliations and funding of the original author. From their own language I'm sure you will find that all parties connected with the them are very muchly opposed to 'Hobson's Pledge'.

I look forward to your explanation

Sincerely Concerned Wikipedia Supporter