User talk:ManuelC08

April 2020
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Jordan Carver—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. I dream of horses (talk) (contribs) Remember to &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me after replying off my talk page 19:12, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jordan Carver. Zim Zala Bim talk 19:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 19:18, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

I am sorry for my actions ManuelC08 (talk) 20:34, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

I am sorry for my vandalizing actions. I knew that it was wrong but I still did it. All of the changes were for entertainment purposes. I was going to revert the text back to the original documents. I am sorry for the inconvenience and it will never happen again. I am also very sorry for wasting all of your time and I hope you have a good rest of your day. Sincerely ManuelC08 ManuelC08 (talk) 20:39, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

I understand your reasoning for the unblock. I respect your decision and I agree that I am not at the maturity level yet but, I am not allowed to log out of Wikipedia, and since I cannot do that I am not allowed to read any articles or edit my user page. I hope there is a way to fix this problem by following your guidelines. Sincerely ManuelC08 ManuelC08 (talk) 20:59, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

ManuelC08 (talk) 22:57, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

As this account is considered WP:COMPROMISED, this is the end of the line. I have revoked talk page access. This account is not eligible for unblock consideration, and there's frankly no possibility it would have been unblocked even had you not compromised the account. I'm sorry, but this is a valuable lesson for your son. Hopefully in the future, he will have learnt how to treat women with respect, rather than proclaim to the world, "her only accomplishment is her watermelon sized enlarged boobs." --Yamla (talk) 23:05, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note, though, as has already been pointed out to you, your son has the ability to read all articles. We've only blocked editing, not reading. --Yamla (talk) 23:06, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.