User talk:Manuelclement

Vinicola's Sacramental Wine
A tag has been placed on Vinicola's Sacramental Wine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. If you can indicate why Vinicola's Sacramental Wine is really not blatant advertising, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Vinicola's Sacramental Wine. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11 under General criteria. You might also want to read the guidelines on spam. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert why the article is not blatant advertising, please affix the template  to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. -WarthogDemon 06:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Sacramental wine.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sacramental wine.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:09, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Sacramental wine.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Sacramental wine.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:18, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

GANV RAKHON JAGRUT MANCH, CURCHOREM - Goa.
The Burning issues in Goa.

Date: 13th August 2010. Ganv Rakhon Jagrut Manch, Churchorem keeps Hunger Strike scheduled on Independence Day, Sunday 15th August 2010 on hold in view of Goa Government decision vide letter no.22/22/2009 – RD dated 09/08/2010 addressed to the collector, South Goa District to keep the Land Acquisition process of Four Lane Road from Tilamol to Sanguem Court in abeyance. However, our fight will continue till the Land Acquisition Notification No. 23/2/2010 –RD dated 22/06/2010 is completely dropped. As per the above letter following proposals relating to the mining Bye-Pass in South Goa District have been kept in abeyance:-

1)Land acquisition for construction of mining Bye-Pass road from Uguem to Kapxem (Phase II) Uguem to Santona Sanguem Taluka.

2)Land Acquisition for construction of mining Bye – Pass Road from Uguem to Kapxem (Phase I) Guddemol to Kapxem in Sanguem Taluka.

3)Land Acquisition for construction to diversion / Bye-Pass Road for mining traffic from Taak to Sirvoi near Teachers Colony via Mendek in village Rivona of Sanguem Taluka and village Deo and Sirvoi of Quepem Taluka.

4)Land Acquisition proposal for widening of 4- Lane from Tilamol to Sanguem Court via Curchorem Constituency. It is clear from the above letter that this Land Acquisition proposed for widening of 4- Lane from Tilamol to Sanguem Court via Curchorem Constituency was meant to have mining Bye-Pass and not for the improvement of Curchorem Constituency and concerned authorities were taking the villagers of Curchorem, Cacora and Xeldem - Tilamol for a ride that the 4- Lane is for improvement of  Curchorem  Constituency.

Ganv Rahkon Jagrut Manch appeals to Government of Goa to construct a mining Bye-Pass Road which should not affect any residential house, entire ecology, and should not create pollution, health hazards and the same be taken without affecting the right to life of the villagers of Tilamol, Sonfator, Cacora, Curchorem and Xeldem.