User talk:Manufan1359

Andy Anson
Why have you been removing the info relating to Anson's involvement with United's sponsorship deals? The info is sourced, so there shouldn't be any need to remove it. Do you have reason to believe that the info is erroneous? – PeeJay 02:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Please do not remove content without specifying a reason for its removal in the edit summary. Without an edit summary, your edits could be construed as vandalism. – PeeJay 02:32, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. – PeeJay 02:33, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * You have now been reported for edit warring. If you wish to make a statement on your own behalf, you can do so here. – PeeJay 02:41, 3 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I have protected the page rather than block you, since both you and PeeJay were engaged in edit warring, which is not allowed here.  However, you MUST go to the talkpage of the Andy Anson article to discuss why you believe this material should not be included. PeeJay has asked you above to explain the reasons for your edit, and now is the time to explain yourself, or the material will no doubt be readded when the page is unprotected. --Slp1 (talk) 03:14, 3 November 2009 (UTC)