User talk:Manway/Archives/2010/June

lake howell high
Hey -- thanks for your response to my edit. For consistency's sake, can you add the citations directly to the LHHS page for the alumni you left in the article? That should be more durable than relying on the linked wiki articles to retain the mention/citation. thanks, Mote (talk) 06:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Got 'em all except one - the only mention is in his Wiki article - although it claims that the school's weight room has been named after him. Think you could do a little digging in your spare time? Thanks for the note and kind regards. --Manway (talk) 06:42, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Rock on. Thanks! Mote (talk) 01:44, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire WePlaySMAC External Link
You reversed an external link by WePlayCiv/WePlaySMAC in February. They replaced it. I have made a proposal on the discussion page of Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire discussion page to deal with them in that article and Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri. Since I have a disclosed conflict of interest, I would appreciate it if you would look at it. Thanks.

Vyeh (talk) 21:42, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Image on Kim Heechul
Ouch! Thanks for reverting my error. I'd just fixed another page where the same editor had removed a valid image, and I failed to AGF and check properly. -  Begoon (talk) 14:05, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * That's why I didn't just revert - I edited. You had made a valid edit, just missed that the image wasn't there!
 * Happens all the time. Done it myself. No problem - nice to make your acquaintance. Regards. --Manway (talk) 15:13, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Minyanville rewrite
Hello Manway,

Per the instructions in the tag, I removed the speedy delete from Minyanville -- please allow me a couple of days to rewrite the article so that it meets Wikipedia standards. Thanks, Rgfolsom (talk) 21:03, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks much. I do intend to add more relevant information over the next several days, that company is a leading provider of financial commentary with a lot of talented contributors, plus some other noteworthy content. Please do feel free to offer suggestions/tweaks along the way.:--Rgfolsom (talk) 03:31, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

"You are apparently LDS."
Ha. Son, I'm an agnostic who does not have and has not ever had any connection to the LDS Church. I was raised Episcopalian loosely, but have no religious affiliation at this point in my life whatsoever. The article in question is not about the accounts of Mormonism by those who have left the church, it is an article on polygamy with small sections covering Mormon beliefs and practice. We need top quality sources for this and NOT ONE NON-EXPERT'S opinion. That's just a basic matter of standard practice here. Please see WP:NPOV, and WP:V. This has nothing to do with Mormonism specifically and all to do with what type of source you are trying to use to verify what type of claim. And indeed my edit summaries and talk page responses have been addressing precisely this. If you wanted to state this person's opinion you have to attribute it inline, but then the question is if its notable enough, and in due WP:WEIGHT to be in an article on polygamy ... and clearly it is not. Regards.Griswaldo (talk) 18:35, 23 June 2010 (UTC)