User talk:Manway/Archives/2010/March

what vandalism??
This edit of mine was reverted by you in this edit with the summary "Reverted 1 edit by Wasted Time R identified as vandalism to last revision by Leahtwosaints. (TW)". Why on earth did you consider my edit vandalism? I was correcting the date in the caption (it had confused European day-month order with the American reverse) and I added an alt description per WP:ALT. Wasted Time R (talk) 00:35, 12 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the response, see mine on my talk page. Wasted Time R (talk) 01:13, 12 March 2010 (UTC)


 * See response there again. Wasted Time R (talk) 02:15, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

John Coltrane
Thank you very much. your barnstar and kind compliments mean a lot to me.--Work permit (talk) 05:09, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Patty Loveless
I'm stumped. It's either too late or I'm missing something very simple.

On the Patty Loveless article it says that it is missing the references/ tag - I keep adding that, but it won't accept it on preview. What am I doing wrong? Thanks! --Manway (talk) 08:01, 24 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Fixed; there was a &lt;ref> with no closing &lt;/ref>. Quite a common trouble. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  08:22, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

✅

P.S. not sure why you removed the - this was a good use of it.  Chzz  ►  08:23, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism??

 * why is telling a guy off for vandalising considered vandalism in your opinion —Preceding unsigned comment added by WOLFE0007 (talk • contribs) 04:32, 28 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Because the way you're doing it is wrong. If you think he's vandalizing, use the warning templates and report him to the administrators. --Manway (talk) 04:35, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * okay but thats gone and now he's claiming to be doing good and saying it was a mistake to others yet he will not give me any reponse WOLFE0007 (talk) 04:42, 28 March 2010 (UTC)


 * can u explain the reporting procedure then please because i am unaware as i have a life beyond this website WOLFE0007 (talk) 04:50, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Harlem
Just don't want to get into trouble for removing something thats not vandalism :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wintonian (talk • contribs) 04:35, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

TRL
I'm confused as to why my edits were considered vandalism and reverted.

ScrappyFan (talk) 06:16, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

In that case, I would like to know how the Retirement Home is extraneous.

ScrappyFan (talk) 06:26, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

I have no idea how the Skype highlighting even got there.

Videos that lasted a certain number of days on the countdown were "retired". It was a significant concept.

ScrappyFan (talk) 06:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

ScrappyFan (talk) 07:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC)