User talk:Mapdasilva

February 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to History of Brazil have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: History of Brazil was changed by Mapdasilva (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855218 on 2023-02-02T21:37:43+00:00

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to History of Brazil, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:45, 3 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello! Thank you for noticing it. That big removal was because I thought it was going beyond the history of Brasil and going into economics. Appreciate your quick feedback! Mapdasilva (talk) 02:29, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at History of Brazil, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''It is very likely that your edits were well-intentioned, although editing needs to be done correctly to avoid confusion and misinformation. Please do not be discouraged by this message and feel free to reach out if I can be of any help.'' Ppt91 (talk) 00:29, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into History of Brazil. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 03:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you! Should I do any changes in Sebastianism (i.e. attribution) or you did them already? I cannot be sure. Thank you once again... it's a learning process! Mapdasilva (talk) 03:59, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I have done it for the text you brought over from Sebastianism, but if there were any other articles involved, please go ahead and add the attribution like I did. DanCherek (talk) 12:53, 4 February 2023 (UTC)