User talk:MapleviewLounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slicks (November 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Slicks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Slicks Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Slicks reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:40, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the response.
 * I think i now have a better grasp of everything.
 * thank you! MapleviewLounge (talk) 16:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Jacob Schlichter for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jacob Schlichter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jacob Schlichter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 17:44, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Conflict-of-interest required disclosures
Hello, MapleviewLounge. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:04, 7 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I understand. Tank you Jamie! MapleviewLounge (talk) 18:12, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/MapleviewLounge. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:29, 8 December 2022 (UTC)


 * A more likely explanation is that these two three accounts and the subject are the same individual. OhNo itsJamie Talk 05:00, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Slicks
Hello, MapleviewLounge. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Slicks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Slicks


Hello, MapleviewLounge. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Slicks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC)