User talk:Mar11

April 2016
Hello. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Duleek/Bellewstown GAA without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 15:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

About the deletion nomination of Tanim Sufyani and Pledge Karma
Hello there, I would really like to know why you have nominated these pages for deletion and both in the same day. As far your user page is concerned I understand you are someone who is quite interested in politics. I don't see any reason why you should be interested in music and nevertheless, you have mentioned as the reason being "not a notable musician" but didn't show enough evidence. So can you please explain this apparent malicious act of vandalism against a particular group of musical act?

I hope you will understand the fact and give an explanation. You are welcome to leave your argument in User_talk:Gyangurubd.
 * All the sources on the pages were unreliable and fail to demonstrate notability of the subject. You can check the version I had nominated for deletion. Tanim Sufyani (Full of unreliable citations for Stentorian, not Tanim Sufyani) Pledge Karma (Full of Amadergaan links, an unreliable source, currently the site has been sold to other owner). - Mar11 (talk) 06:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Adding tags in Bangladesh Nationalist Party
Hello, I noticed that you have added a handful of tags in the Bangladesh Nationalist Party including WP:Third-party sources and WP:POV though the sources used in the article is neither based on sources closely linked with the subject, nor from any unverifiable source. All the references used in the article are from either books of internationally recognized authors or the authors from the rival camp of the subject.

I hope you will understand the fact and remove the tag yourself. You are welcome to leave your argument in my talk page.

You removed my edit on UpWork page
I would like to know why are you removing the survey results? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Murtuzi (talk • contribs) 15:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello friend,

You removed a survey result from the UpWork page, I have restored it,

I'm a UpWork freelancer and I think it is really helpful for UpWork users to be able to read / see the survey.

I have restored it, if you wish to remove it, please talk to me first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Murtuzi (talk • contribs) 19:17, 5 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Explained on Talk:Upwork. - Mar11 (talk) 16:32, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for looking carefully to my edits. :) --94.15.107.153 (talk) 18:15, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Mar11
Thank you for looking to my edits and updates. But please allow me to add some social links and Awards category in Rudralife Wikipedia Page. There is no legal issues will be arise for the data. Its genuine data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.58.3.222 (talk) 05:56, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Mar11
Thank you for looking to my edits and updates. But please allow me to add some social links and Awards category in Rudralife Wikipedia Page. There is no legal issues will be arise for the data. Its genuine data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sudarshanthatypally (talk • contribs) 05:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Lead image on electric car article
Hi Mar 11. This is to let you know that I undid your edit on the electric car article because you ignored the hidden message about seeking consensus before changing the current image (check the threads on the talk history page to see the long discussions we had had to choose the current image). In addition, as per the Manual of Style, the lead should only have one illustrating image. Nevertheless, I believe the picture you brought is a very good candidate for the lead, screaming "electric car," so I opened a discussion in the talk to seek consensus. If you wish, please drop by. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 02:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

List of companies of Nigeria
Hi Mar11, I reverted your move of List of companies of Nigeria. It goes against the current precedence involving hundreds of other articles in Category:Lists of companies by country. If you contest this move, consider WP:RM and explain why the other title is more appropriate. Thanks — Andy W.  ( talk  · ctb) 00:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Kazi Nazrul Islam
Hello, I was wondering how the GA review of Kazi Nazrul Islam is going. Thank you.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:54, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, I have read and verified almost one third of the article. But I was wondering how to verify the contents which are taken from books that are not available online. I am new to Wikipedia, and it is my first GA review. - Mar11 (talk) 17:24, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Cathal Moonan speedy
I agree that this was a candidate for speedy (and it has now been speedied since the author blanked it), but your G1 request was not valid. Perhaps you meant A1? Meters (talk) 18:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry man, my mistake. It should be A1. - Mar11 (talk)

Regarding the image of Ramna Kali Mandir
The image of Ramna Kali Mandir that you uploaded in has an improper licensing information. This photograph falls under the category of artistic work and its creator is also known. Therefore this work can be in public domain only after "60 years have passed since the year of death of the author" (the fourth criteria in the licensing box), which mathematically impossible as of 2016. So the image can be nominated for deletion any moment. Therefore I'm restoring the previous image of Ramna Kali Mandir in the article. The previous image is uploaded under a fair use criteria of historic non-free image. BengaliHindu (talk) 14:31, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

72.188.100.187
Just an FYI. Your ES said Unexplained removal. The IP did give a fairly lengthy ES. I just reverted the IP's second removal. I don't think the IP read the source, probably a "didn't like". Denial is the easy way out... Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:44, 7 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Sorry, don't know why I missed his ES. - Mar11 (talk) 06:55, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Brian Tracy International
I have restored and moved it to User:Mar11/Brian Tracy International where you can work on it. As it currently is it would not survive as an article. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:31, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia Asian Month!
Hi there! Thanks for joining Wikipedia Asian Month. Here is some information about participating in the event: Best Wishes,--AddisWang (talk) 15:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Please submit your articles via this tool. Click 'log in' at the top-right and OAuth will take care the rest. You can also change the interface language at the top-right.
 * 2) Once you submit an article, the tool will add a template to the article and mark it as needing review by an organizer. You can check your progress using the tool, which includes how many accepted articles you have.
 * 3) Participants who achieve 4 accepted articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard. You will receive another special postcard if you achieve 15 accepted articles. The Wikipedian with the highest number of accepted articles on the English Wikipedia will be honored as a "Wikipedia Asian Ambassador", and will receive a signed certificate and additional postcard.
 * 4) If you have any problems accessing or using the tool, you can submit your articles at this page next to your username.
 * 5) Wikipedia Asian Month is also held in other language Wikipedia and count independently. Check for language editions.
 * 6) If you have any question, you can take a look at our Q&A or post on the WAM talk page.

Budgie spam
Hi, thank you for reverting all those spam links. The spammer has been blocked indefinitely for his actions, something that might have happened sooner if you had issued formal warnings on his talk page. Something to bear in mind if you ever see such a thing again... All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:17, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hello Mar11. Your account has been added to the " " user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk. The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:12, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
 * Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.
 * Thank you very much for providing me this tool. - Mar11 (talk) 11:57, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter
Hello ,


 * Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action. If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work! Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.
 * Second set of eyes

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation. Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .
 * Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

Rollback granted
Hi Mar11. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AMar11 enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 21:26, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.
 * Thank you very much. - Mar11 (talk) 06:55, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 18:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the tool. - Mar11 (talk) 05:15, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Andrej Kedveš
Can you explain why you unreviewed the article Andrej Kedveš which I had reviewed.Peter Rehse (talk) 22:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Unintentional . Sorry for that. - Mar11 (talk) 07:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Do the same sometimes,Peter Rehse (talk) 08:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks re The Gadget Flow
Unusually good eye, especially on CNN Greece vs Huffington Post and the concept that this was based off a press release. See my Keep changed to comment. I moved the content to the draft. And are you interested in this subject? I'll run it by you. I anticipate that at 15m views/mo TGF will probably get some more coverage from US-based publications, no?JanisWilloughby (talk) 16:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

New Page Review - newsletter #2
Hello ,


 * Please help reduce the New Page backlog 

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.


 * Getting the tools we need

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .
 * Improve the tools: Vote here.
 * Reduce your review load: Vote here

DYK nomination of Mangal Shobhajatra
Hello! Your submission of Mangal Shobhajatra at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 18:22, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Ashraful Hossen Saeed.jpg
This photo i am user user at photograph Ashraful Hossen Saeed.jpg please resolve the issue — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ismailim (talk • contribs) 05:34, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK
Hello! Your submission of Mangal Shobhajatra at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America1000 10:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Mangal Shobhajatra
 Schwede 66  12:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.2
Hello , We now have New Page Reviewers! Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October. The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work! It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to. Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten. This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody,  and
 * A HUGE backlog
 * Second set of eyes
 * Abuse
 * 1) this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting  in  a community ban.
 * 2) this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in  a community ban.
 * 3) This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Tagging Pankaj Razdan
Thanks for having a look at this article, but a one-paragraph article does not need to be divided into sections, so I suggest that it wasn't helpful to add that tag. On the other hand you could usefully have tagged it with link rot, otherwise known as Bare URLs. Thanks. Pam D  08:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the suggestions. - Mar11 (talk) 07:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Nudging merger proposal
About nine months ago you tagged Freedom of religion in Bangladesh to be merged into Secularism in Bangladesh. Since then the former has changed considerably. You didn't lay out at the time why you thought merging would be a good idea. Could you take another look at the articles as they stand today, see if you still feel a merge is the best approach, and if so either complete the merger or briefly sketch out on the discussion page what you'd like to see accomplished in a merger? --Worldbruce (talk) 22:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3
Hello , Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed. We now have New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced. If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Still a MASSIVE backlog

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment
Requested move 21 February 2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.44.251.34 (talk) 13:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Removal of content from Nokia 3310 (2017) article
Mar11, I noticed you removed my addition to the Nokia 3310 (2017). I feel it was a mistake and I think you should revisit it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David.Nwachukwu (talk • contribs) 17:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi I have restored your edits but with much better grammar and a better, more well known source. :) Kamran Mackey (talk) 18:08, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Re. Nazi UFOs
Hi, sorry about that. This was a while back now, evidently my ISP does recycle IP addresses.

Are you familiar with the concept of dark energy? Seems that antigravity is indeed possible and I have experimental proof. Releasing a paper very soon which could earn me a Nobel one day, if my analysis is indeed later found to be correct and could be a giant step towards a ToE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.3.100.46 (talk) 02:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Satoshi Nakamoto
I do believe this info is accurate & relevant. Have added it to the Talk Page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.255.66.236 (talk) 19:33, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anjhula Mya Singh Bais (April 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anjhula Mya Singh Bais and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  04:50, 30 April 2017 (UTC) Hi have you checked the references I added in the article? Searched in google news? I think the issue is not about reliable sources. The subject got enough coverage to pass notability. The issue here was notability claim. We discussed this issue Here and I re-wrote the article and claimed notability as an international refugee psychologist. What's your thought? Why did you declined it for insignificance coverage? - Mar11 (talk) 05:33, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Evaluating its weight shows it would simply not be enough for notability hence not significant enough. SwisterTwister   talk  05:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

StargateARMAserver
I noticed you tagged StargateARMAserver with G5 but left out the blocked user. I can't find any obvious signs but what is the account? (I'm just curious) CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  12:03, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't know why the user was not notified. I used twinkle to tag the article. May be the problem is in Twinkle. - Mar11 (talk) 12:09, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Twinkle doesn't notify for G5 - it's one of the few exceptions but it's not the issue of notifying the user. Who is the blocked user you suspect created it in violation of their ban/block? CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  12:10, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't even remember tagging the article with G5. As far I can remember, I tagged it with G11+A7. This is the user I think. - Mar11 (talk) 12:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Archana Akhil Kumar
Hello Mar11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Archana Akhil Kumar, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. Thank you.  So Why  13:35, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * And I've just declined it again. The article clearly makes a credible claim of significance.  Please stop tagging it for CSD - this is at least the third time it's been nominated and declined, and repeatedly doing so could be considered disruptive and lead to sanctions.  GoldenRing (talk) 12:14, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I think you are talking about VideoBlocks, not Archana Akhil Kumar. - Mar11 (talk) 18:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Bah, sorry, you are quite right. Nonetheless, it's survived speedy three (four?) times now.  It's not going to be deleted.  If you're still convinced it's not notable, WP:AfD is thataway.  GoldenRing (talk) 18:39, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Socialism in Bangladesh
—David Levy 03:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4
Hello ,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just reviews, the  backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Electronic component
Please explain why you restored a link I removed with the edit summary "Rv blank" as if you were reverting a common vandal. I explained in my edit summary that I considered the link to be spam masquarading as a reference. I think I deserve a better explanation than "rv blank". Printed circuit boards, as the platform for 90% of modern electronics, hardly needs a reference in a list of electronic components. Even if it did, a page that does not confirm that they are an electronic component, or even hardly mention them, is not an appropriate reference. The site belongs to a manufacturer selling pcbs, which is the likely reason for its insertion rather than to verify any actual fact in the article. SpinningSpark 16:31, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry....My mistake. I was about to revert the blanking previously done by a vandal. But somehow reverted your edit. That was silly, restored a spam while reverting a section blanking.  -  Mar11 (talk) 03:30, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anjhula Mya Singh Bais (June 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anjhula Mya Singh Bais and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 19:18, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.
 * Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Page Curation/Suggested improvements
 * The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
 * User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
 * User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:
 * Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
 * Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Stub sorting
Please don't use the Stub tag if you can find a more specific stub tag; stub sort whenever you are able. To do otherwise will backlog Category:Stubs. Thank you. (I realize some people aren't able to stub sort very well due to issues surrounding memory or feeling overwhelmed by the unfortunately long list of stub types; sorry if you're one of them). -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  07:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!
 * The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: 
 * On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
 * Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.
 * Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.
 * The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Wikipedia Asian Month 2017: Invitation to Participate


Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.

Thank you!

- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

Speedy deletion declined: Shohortoli
Hello Mar11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Shohortoli, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Being signed to a notable label indicates importance/significance (WP:CCSI, WP:CCSI). Thank you.  So Why  14:59, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Clarify
Explain your AFC accept at Draft:MagForce AG and your NPP review at HYPR.Regards:) Winged Blades Godric 08:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Dear Mar11, You have "released" article Draft:MagForce AG a month ago. Your decision has been overruled by another user. Winged Blades asked you (in a harsh tone) to explain your release. Do you like to do that? The article, which of course I think is good, is pending for weeks… Atomiccocktail (talk) 11:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The company clearly passes notability, a google news search (MagForce Nanotechnologies/MagForce AG) will show that. Most of the information in the draft are cited with secondary sources and some with primary sources (information about them). The article seemed non-promotional to me (that varies from person to person I think) and the creator didn't violate policy of WP:PAID (disclosed affiliation and didn't publish the article themselves). I think we should appreciate the editors who disclose COI/PAID. Otherwise they will try to publish articles incognito. - Mar11 (talk) 06:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Dear Mar11, Thank you for your statement. I will inform Winged Blades and ask him to reverse his decision. To whom it may concern: I have written this article for the company respectively its PR agency. I have completely disclosed that. See the talk page. Atomiccocktail (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Anshul Pandey
Hello Mar11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Anshul Pandey, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: playing non-extra roles on multiple notable shows indicates significance. Thank you.  So Why  08:20, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Outreach and Invitations:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
 * Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
 * If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: . Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive
 * A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
 * Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. —  TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 
 * ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
 * The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

You removed informations from Mehazabien Chowdhury's Page
I would like to know why are you removing birth date, other names, notable works informations from Mehazabien Chowdhury's page? All the information have been given by herself in interviews and social media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joybiswas391 (talk • contribs) 07:10, 23 December 2017 (UTC)


 * One of the five pillars of Wikipedia is, each statement in an article must be sourced from a reliable source. Unsourced information in WP:BLP must be removed. Personal website and social media are not regarded as reliable sources in Wikipedia. Information heard from someone is not reliable source either. - Mar11 (talk) 17:23, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * so how we would I prove them? All the information are given by Mehazabien Chowdhury herself. So how would I prove those statements?

I'm connected with her. Other actors like Ziaul Faruk Apurba, Farhan Ahmed Jovan don't have source from verified sources. Unlike other actors and celebrities I want Mehazabien Chowdhury's wiki page clean and clear but you are continuously removing those information. I don't get it. :(
 * You should refrain from editing that article. It is prohibited to edit article of a connected person by this policy: Conflict of interest. It is because, connected contributor can never edit an article from a neutral point of view. A general reader will understand how much promotional you have made this article. However, You can suggest information with published, secondary reliable sources on the talk page of the article. - Mar11 (talk) 17:46, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * And also, don't upload images downloaded from Facebook. The copyright terms of Facebook and Wikipedia do not match. If you have any image that you captured yourself, you can upload them without hesitation. There must be exif information with the image. Thanks. - Mar11 (talk) 17:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I am editing the article from neutral point of view. I get connected with her to verify the information. That's it. Anyway I give up :)

I'm not contributing anymore no matter how many times I edit,add things there's someone else who asks for the verification! How can a person prove each and every words!
 * That's how Wikipedia works. Anyway thanks for your efforts. You should not give up. Suggest your changes in talk page. Edit and improve other articles to which you don't have any conflict of interest. - Mar11 (talk) 18:25, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

New Years new page backlog drive
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:


 * The total number of reviews completed for the month.
 * The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your expert advice needed
Hi. I noticed that you are interested in law. Can you please take a look at this discussion about Reid Collins & Tsai article? I would appreciate your expert advice on the subject. -- Bbarmadillo

Corybas walliae
Hello Mar11,

Thanks for your work. It is pretty clear to me that CarlosL is trying to write a page about Corybas walliae and has tried to upload an image to illustrate that species of orchid. Please hold off with the deletion while I try to help him. Thanks. Gderrin (talk) 05:16, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Appreciated. -Mar11 (talk) Sorted. Thanks for your patience. Gderrin (talk) 05:43, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Michał Frąckowiak
Hello Mar11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Michał Frąckowiak, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Founding a notable company indicates importance/significance (WP:CCSI). Thank you.  So Why  10:07, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Supply Chain
Hi

Wikipedia has separate contents for supply chain and supply chain management. There is an overlap of supply chain management in the supply chain page. The supply chain content is not neutral.

Consider my editing on the supply chain page as essential, although I just started to contribute to wikipedia pages.

Sukumaran s (talk) 21:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC) Sukumaran


 * Thanks for your concern about the article. But this is not the way the lead section of an Wikipedia article is written or edited. There are certain rules for writing the lead which can be read here WP:LEAD. Changes in the lead section should be upon consensus among the editors. You can propose your changes on the talk page of the article and ask for suggestion and seek consensus from other editors. - Mar11 (talk) 04:19, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Move discussion for Internal conflict in Bangladesh
An article that you have been involved in editing—Internal conflict in Bangladesh —has been proposed to be renamed and moved. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

WPUNDUE listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WPUNDUE. Since you had some involvement with the WPUNDUE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BillHPike (talk, contribs) 08:34, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: New Year Backlog Drive results:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
 * We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!
 * We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
 * Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

Speedy deletion declined: DJ KGB
Hello Mar11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of DJ KGB, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''producing albums for notable artists is a claim of significance. Try PROD or AFD instead.''' Thank you. SoWhy 09:17, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about carswitch
Hello Mar11

This is with regards to my editing issue. I have given my contribution without any sort of payment and to help grow more information of the present world by building and editing articles from the information derived from the global news sites. With no motive of income, these edits are absolutely free and have been made during the free and pass time as an interest in writing and editing. Please consider the request for letting me help to build new informative and present company, popular icons, and upcoming innovators who shape are shaping the world and bringing change. Strictly following the interest and laws of Wikipedia, I swear to continue to do free edits and creation of pages.

Thank You! — Preceding unsigned comment added by StrRdYUUdK (talk • contribs) 19:38, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you! WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! WMF Surveys, 01:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: NordVPN (software)
Hello Mar11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of NordVPN (software), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 cannot be applied to software. Thank you. SoWhy 11:49, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

'''If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again.''' We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. WMF Surveys, 00:33, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Re: Speedy deletion nomination of Tapps Games
I clearly mentioned that it's a company that develops mobile games for iOS and Android devices. I added its history, its growth and its impact on the mobile gaming industry. I also added the necessary categories and references. It is short because there aren't many reliable sources, but I am still adding more sources and information. Perhaps just give it time? Undead Organism (talk) 04:58, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Moved it to draftspace. Submit it for review when you think it's complete. - Mar11 (talk) 05:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I have emphasized the significance of the article and added the logo. What are your thoughts? Undraftify? - Undead Organism (talk) 05:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The draft does not contain any secondary sources to help the subject pass WP:GNG. Please read the Notability criterion of Wikipedia before submitting any article for review. - Mar11 (talk) 10:28, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your warm welcome message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russ manzil (talk • contribs) 03:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Can you review this submission?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Application_strings_manager — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russ manzil (talk • contribs) 03:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

RAW Pressery Deletion
Hello Mar11, Regarding your reason for deletion of the page, I have removed the information about the fundraising by the company and its connected sources. Some of the other sources that have been used for citation include https://www.thehindubusinessline.com - A very independent and noteworthy newspaper website of the country, https://www.crunchbase.com/ - an independent, reliable website that tracks information about all companies using their own sources, http://bwdisrupt.businessworld.in - an independent business Magazine's website, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com - (used in multiple citations)Economic Times is a section of the noteworthy and independent newspaper of the country The Times of India.

Raw Pressery is trying hard to educate the people of India about the concept of Cold-pressed juice. Cold pressed juice being free of preservatives, artificial flavours and chemicals is a very healthy (and a much needed) alternative to the other tasty but non cold-pressed juices available in the market. I have also observed that Raw pressery promotes a healthy lifestyle among the masses through their Yoga/exercise related events/workshops etc. and they not only care about the health of the people but also that of the environment, through their initiative called RAWcycle, which is about creating polymer based tshirts/clothes by recycling the plastic (their plastic bottles). I have not added this information in the article because of lack of better and noteworthy sources. All of these facts about the brand and it's growing popularity among the masses inspired me to do some research and write this article. When @MatthewVanitas approved the afc submission of this article, it was graded as StartClass and this article can have a better future if you do not delete it, as our Wiki community will add more on the page. In fact, given your expertise on Wikipedia, you can guide me into making relevant changes to the article if needed instead of deleting it. Rest is up to you. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akash1221 (talk • contribs) 07:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

My Girls (film)
I'm curious as to why you marked the above article as patrolled minutes after I had prodded it while patrolling. Articles that are marked up for deletion shouldn't be marked as patrolled. Why? If the prod is removed or a speedy declined, it will remain marked as patrolled. Pretty obviously, if one editor thinks it deficient enough to warrant immediate deletion, and a second editor disagrees, shouldn't a third editor be looking at it? Also, mechanically speaking, marking an article patrolled removes the NOINDEX attribute from it. We don't really want new articles that are up for deletion showing up in a Google search, do we? John from Idegon (talk) 04:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I was also trying to add a speedy tag to the article but due to the edit conflict with you i had canceled it. Don't know how it was marked patrolled in this time. - Mar11 (talk) 04:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * It's a bug in the script. If you use the sidebar to access a deletion process, it will mark the page as patrolled. If just use Twinkle, it won't. Out of curiosity, what criteria were you going to use for speedy? That always baffles me for films. John from Idegon (talk) 04:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clarification. I was trying to add A11, as there is no source in the article and nothing appears on google search. - Mar11 (talk) 04:38, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * You sure wouldn't be stepping on my toes if you went ahead and did that. I agree it's junk and could even be a hoax. John from Idegon (talk) 04:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

New page reviewer revoked
Hi. I have revoked your ability to review new pages as from a review of your recent reviews (and even stretching back to 2017) you have reviewed numerous articles that appear to be undisclosed paid editing. Some examples are below:

While it's obviously impossible for me to know whether this is due to malice or incompetence you obviously cannot be trusted to review pages. SmartSE (talk) 22:51, 6 June 2018 (UTC)


 * See Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard. SmartSE (talk) 23:14, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing The NAGA Group AG, Mar11.

Unfortunately SamHolt6 has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

"Unreviewed, review has been stripped of their new page reviewer rights per a COIN discussion"

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

SamHolt6 (talk) 00:24, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm SamHolt6. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Dr. Cleaner, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

SamHolt6 (talk) 02:44, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm SamHolt6. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, CALinnovates, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

SamHolt6 (talk) 04:33, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for meatpuppetry and undisclosed paid editing. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. SmartSE (talk) 15:56, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Because you thanked me
13:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Haldaa poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Haldaa poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Bangladesh Gazette.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:The Bangladesh Gazette.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 19 December 2021 (UTC)