User talk:Maratishe

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Maratishe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! VQuakr (talk) 06:49, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Author piggybacking. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 06:55, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Piggybacking
Hi, you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~

I deleted your recent article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts or show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although you may be an experienced copyeditor, original research is not accepted. Although you gave a couple of examples of organisations that discourage the practice, you did not provide references from independent sources to support your definitions or show why they are notable. As a science editor, I'm sure you are aware of the importance of proper referencing  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)


 * (later) User:VQuakr has suggested I was too harsh/incorrect in deleting, so I'll restore shortly, but the comments above should be addressed, since a Google search shows only this article as a use of the term in the context you indicate. Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  09:27, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Author piggybacking


The article Author piggybacking has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No sources to show notability. The two sources cited briefly refer to teh practice, but that is all, and neither of them even refers to it as "piggybacking". Also, the article is written like a personal reflection or essay, with opinions (e.g. "It would, however, be nice to see...", "author piggybacking is and obvious problem", etc).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:08, 16 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Why not try adding to Academic authorship using reliable sources? Fences  &amp;  Windows  01:18, 23 August 2011 (UTC)