User talk:Marc Venot

Welcome
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!


 * If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.


 * You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: . If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.


 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 20:50, 10 Jan 2004 (UTC)

No, not at all, that's the beauty of it. Consider if this was not the case; given the example of PABX and it's full term "Private branch exchange". Then, when writing about PABX systems, one would have to always use the full expansion. Since we have the "pipe trick", you need only link as PABX, and that'll show up as PABX, and will act as if you have typed Private branch exchange. All that does is change the text of the link. HTH and don't hesitate to ask me any other questions you may have. Thanks Dysprosia 09:19, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Ben Nevis
In Talk:Ben_Nevis, you wrote "cable car to Torlundy, 701 m ?" What do you mean by that?

Also it is considered polite to sign your additions to talk pages. --Grouse 20:22, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * I have seen it on a brochure but since I have never been there it's a question if it exists? Marc Venot 20:51, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Vasco da Gama
An article that you've edited before (Vasco da Gama) is nominated for Article Improvement Drive. If you want go there and vote. Thanks. Gameiro 02:58, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

Question
Why do you keep bypassing redirects containing mathematical relation? Any reason in particular? There is nothing wrong with using redirects on Wikipedia, in some situations it actually makes sense. You can reply in here, I will keep this page on my watchlist. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 01:44, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * on which situations a redirect make sense? Marc Venot 01:45, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * For example, if I want to refer to the Hahn decomposition theorem, I'd rather put a link to the redirect Hahn decomposition theorem than to Hahn decomposition theorem . This because maybe in the future Hahn decomposition theorem will become its own article.


 * And let me answer also with a question. Why are you spending time bypassing those redirects? It is chasing the windmills if you ask me. Redirects are cheap. And if you do bypass them, please put a small "r" at mathematical relation, as the way it is now it looks bad in the middle of sentence. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 01:53, 15 November 2005 (UTC)


 * For the first in principle it could be changed back when the article is done for probably few? - For the second redirects are cheap in process time but we are supposed to do it for the very long term and to do what we can to maximize clearity in this jungle of links, in particular in matematics. I can do the small cap but it's on the "kitchen" side. Marc Venot 02:12, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * It is very hard to change back things, and most people will not bother. And there is no jungle, redirects are a great way to go. Anyway, if you keep on bypassing redirects, don't forget about the small "R" business I mentioned.


 * By the way, a great way of helping the math project is checking the recent changes to the math articles from the list of mathematical topics. One can uncover vandals that way. Another useful thing is to visit WikiProject Mathematics/Current activity and help polish new math articles. If you want more, I can give you more. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:35, 15 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Yes but my main goal is for the wikipedia in Ido. So I will do only marginal changes to the English one (and look if some of the French one can be used) but I certainly wish that the maze is more graphically "grasping". Marc Venot 02:44, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Sharon and Caliban
I reverted the addition of a link to Caliban from the Ariel Sharon page. I apologize if I've removed a good faith edit, but it looked like vandalism, and I fear I cannot see the connection. Justin Eiler 07:50, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Did you look at the link to the Shakespeare play? (the clue is that Ariel and Caliban are two main characters of it). Marc Venot 08:10, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * why this link ? Even if this is a funny coincidence, what is the *real* link ? User:ChrisC 10:24, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * To ask for a "real" link on something which is a cultural buildup for illustration, almost a metaphore, is the paralysing stroke. If you can read French more explanations there Bruno Testa. Marc Venot 21:51, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Est-ce que l'avis de Bruno Testa mérite d'être cité ? Je pense que non car trop orienté mais si vous pensez que oui, je vous suggère de rajouter le lien dans external links, de préciser qu'il s'agit d'un écrit de Bruno Testa et de créer l'article expliquant succintement qui est Bruno Testa (nationalité, carrière, notorité, points marquants). User:ChrisC 12:38, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Je ne connais pas Bruno Testa (et je suis domicilié à des milliers de km de la Réunion) mais je suis un lecteur assidu de ses éditoriaux dont j'en apprécie environ quatre sur cinq. Ce rapprochement littéraire me plait beaucoup mais j'admet qu'il est difficile à intégrer ici. C'est pourquoi il est désormais réservé à la version en ido. Marc Venot 01:04, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Battle of Dakar
Hi, on the Battle of Dakar page, you've added something about the gold of France and Poland that's not quite understandable (what was the relation of this gold to Dakar and the attack?). Could you please elaborate a bit? Thanks! Semprini 14:47, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * During the nazi invasion France central bank's gold, along with the one of Poland it had in dépot, moved it to one of its best defended city in its colonies, Dakar. But of course it was another reason for de Gaulle to want to capture it. Marc Venot 08:00, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, merci. I've changed the wording of the paragraph a bit to clarify that. Semprini 09:50, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Press contact details
If you are receiving this message, you are either a new, existing, or possible future press contact for one of the languages you speak. What does this mean, being a press contact?

The Wikimedia Foundation runs a Communications Committee, which co-ordinates requests for interviews from the press. When we receive a request for an interview, often the journalist wants to interview someone that speaks their "native tongue", or someone that lives in the same country as their publication. For this reason, it is important the the Communications Committee keeps an up-to-date log of contributors that they can trust to represent the community in a professional manner.

This list of press contacts has started to grow. The goal is to eventually have at least one trusted user on the list from every country in the world, and one user for every language that the Foundation runs a project in.

What are your responsibilities? Whenever a journalist requests an interview, either by phone, by e-mail, or (rarely) in person, you are able to either answer the interview request, or pass the request off to another user that you trust. Whenever a newsworthy milestone is reached on your project, you should help co-ordinate the creation of a press release, and once it's ready, send it to me to post in your language's press room.

Any questions, comments, or concerns? Contact me directly. -- en:user_talk:zanimum

Category:Systems
Thank you for your contribution to Category:Systems in the past. There is currently a Call for Deletion for this category. If you would like to contribute to the discussion, you would be very welcome. In particular, if you would like to save this category, please add a Keep entry with your "signature" using " ~ ". Please do this soon if possible since the discussion period is very short. Thank you for your interest if you can contribute. Regards, Jonathan Bowen 18:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)