User talk:Marceki111~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! __meco 08:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

February 2011
Your recent edit to the page Wheel of Fortune (U.S. game show) appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.  Sottolacqua  (talk) 14:07, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

FX Interactive
The page was deleted via WP:PROD, which allows instant restoration if you would like. Do you have more information to add that would establish why it is notable? Otherwise, it will most likely be taken to WP:AFD. MrKIA11 (talk) 20:56, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Battlefield 3
Hi, please learn how to use talk pages, starting with starting new topics at the bottom. Thanks. -- Nczempin (talk) 14:25, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Audiobook
Hi Marceki111. You have placed an afd tag on the Audiobook page. You also need to create a discussion page and then to list the nomination for deletion. Instructions are on the afd tag. Drop me a note if you need help. Kind regards, --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:02, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Monty 845  00:12, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited As the World Turns, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, but my main concern is a message that appears when I edit the page that says "STOP...do not change to "was"...IS remains as "is" per Wikipedia conventions". How can that be if the series has already ended (in 2010, now almost two years ago)? Please clarify that. Marceki111 (talk) 14:34, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Original research tagging
Hi - you've just tagged a bunch of articles as Original research. It would be helpful if you could indicate (perhaps on the talk pages of the articles) what content you think violates WP:OR, so that editors can work to fix the issues. (As the documentation for the Original research template says, "This template should not be applied without explanation on the talk page".) Thanks, - htonl (talk) 13:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Pending some explanation, Marceki, I've reverted these tags. These articles generally have many references, and we'd need some explanation of what, exactly, constitutes original research in these articles. Herostratus (talk) 17:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I marked some articles as "Original research" because they failed to comply with Wikipedia's NPOV ("Neutral Point of View") poclicies, including some parts with the "(citation needed)" mark.--Marceki111 (talk) 12:19, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * OK. But tagging an entire article, with no explanation on the talk page, is not too useful. What is the reader supposed to do, read the article and figure out which parts need correction? If the deal is that the entire article needs a thorough rewrite, then OK, but you should say that on the article talk page. (This could be subject to pushback and if you can't make your case the tag might be removed, though). You can tag individual sections (or even paragraphs) like this: or  or whatever.


 * As far as unreferenced material, your best bet is to just remove it, if you think that that's called for. Again, explanations -- best on the talk page, but at any rate in an edit summary -- are useful. Herostratus (talk) 16:33, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * But what if a certain article does 'not' have a talk page (in other words, the "Talk" tab is red)? What then'?--Marceki111 (talk) 22:53, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Well then you just create the talk page, by being the first one to post to it -- click on the red tab, and it will ask you if you want to create the talk page and offer an edit box to do so. Herostratus (talk) 03:48, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Reverted
I reverted your comment at Manual of Style/Capital letters. Please use the talk page instead if you'd like to make a suggestion. Dicklyon (talk) 21:22, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Marceki111. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Marceki111~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 01:37, 20 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Dear Keegan Peterzell:

I checked and, indeed, this is a unified account, meaning I use the same account for all things wiki, such as Wikipedia in its different languages, Wikimedia, Wikicommons, Wiktionary and so on, so please do not rename it. Yours, --Fandelasketchup (talk) 10:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC) Marcelo Esteban Mauricio

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 15:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)