User talk:Marcelogreat

Welcome!

Hello, Marcelogreat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Anthony Call, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dwayne  was here! &#9835; 01:51, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Anthony Call
A tag has been placed on Anthony Call requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dwayne  was here! &#9835; 01:51, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anthony Call


A tag has been placed on Anthony Call requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — MC10 ( T • C • GB •L)  01:52, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Iguazu Falls
Hi there. There's a bit of a problem with your editing pattern here. Although you've made few edits to Wikipedia, I see you've been around for a couple of years. Therefore, I'll write this manually instead of throwing boilerplate at your talk page.

First things first: you're edit warring, which is never acceptable and could lead to consequences. Please don't do that anymore. Wikipedia content is determined by consensus, and believing you're right just isn't a good enough reason to force your preferred version into article space. (Not even when you are right.) Perhaps you're aware of the "Bold, revert, discuss cycle", which is a widely accepted model for how to make edits which lack clear consensus. Well, you're leaving out the third step—discussion—and instead returning to the first step. That doesn't work very well. One editor reverts you? That means it's time to go to the article's talk page and open a discussion. Two editors revert you? That means it's past time to do that.

Secondly, your edit is not simply rearranging things; it's removing content from the article. You're free to believe that the content isn't helpful (if so, open a discussion to explain why you think so) and you're free to believe that it should go elsewhere in the article (if so, go ahead and move it to another logical location), but you are not free to simply remove it. That you personally don't care about pronunciation is quite beside the point; pronunciation information for non-English article titles is a standard component of thousands of articles, and repeatedly removing it without consensus or cogent explanation is coming uncomfortably close to vandalizing the article.

As for whether Argentina or Brazil is mentioned first, I couldn't care less (although alphabetical would be the usual way to decide that, which happens to work in your favor.) You had the opportunity to make that change without making the other, disputed ones, and you chose to simply revert your reverters. Please don't continue down this path. Rivertorch (talk) 05:12, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello again. While I do appreciate your making a null edit rather than edit warring, Wikipedians don't normally use edit summaries to carry on conversations. I'm happy to discuss it with you here on your talk page if you like. A better option might be to use Talk:Iguazu Falls so that others see the discussion and join in. In any event, I took the time to let you know my thoughts last week (see above), so I'd be grateful if you'd address what I said if you're still concerned about the lead paragraph. Rivertorch (talk) 22:13, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello Rivertorch. apologize if did not follow the rules properly, I am looking forward to learn more about it as per your suggestions. Thank you


 * Sure. If I can be of any help, feel free to ask. Rivertorch (talk) 21:38, 23 August 2012 (UTC)