User talk:Marcelokh

Marcelo Kim
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Passerby Cat talk cat 23:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * In response to your question you left on my talk page, yes, it is vandalism to make an article about yourself. That's what your own page is for. Use it. --Passerby Cat talk cat 23:53, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * No, it is not considered vandalism unless intended to disrupt Wikipedia. This is a standard case of not understanding Wikipedia's criteria for article inclusion and is, as such, not vandalism. -- JLaTondre 01:18, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Please read WP:BIO, WP:AUTO & WP:VANITY regarding the creation of autobiographical articles.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  22:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Speedy Deletes
The article El Cisco has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a person or group of persons but it does not indicate how or why that person or group is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. -- JLaTondre 01:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

The article Marcelo Kim has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a person or group of persons but it does not indicate how or why that person or group is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. -- JLaTondre 01:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Thomas McFadden
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Thomas McFadden, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at Talk:Thomas McFadden. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 17:46, 29 December 2006 (UTC)