User talk:Marchio Ephesi

Welcome!
Hi Marchio Ephesi! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:55, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Email
Please communicate with me here, on-wiki, regarding Wikipedia matters. You may use this talk page (please ping me if you do), or my user talk page (no need to ping me there) or the talk page of the article in dispute (no need to ping me there either; I'm watching that page). I reserve email contact only for matters of such confidentiality that they cannot be discussed in the public eye of Wikipedia. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:55, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Marquess of Ephesus for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marquess of Ephesus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Marquess of Ephesus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Pichpich (talk) 22:14, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Sovereign House of Nicaea for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sovereign House of Nicaea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sovereign House of Nicaea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Pichpich (talk) 22:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Marchioness of Laodicea and other articles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted: • Marchioness of Laodicea (authorship)

• Countess of Philadelphia (authorship)

• Baroness of Pergamon (authorship)

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Marquess of Ephesus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Marchio Ephesi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Makes sense, thank you! I'll try to stay out of the COI @AirshipJungleman29 Marchio Ephesi (talk) 16:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the revision! Marchio Ephesi (talk) 10:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your edit to Marchioness of Laodicea has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. – DreamRimmer (talk) 10:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the revision @DreamRimmer! I apologize for being new to WP, therefore I didn't know how to properly sustain the article with sources.
 * Marchio Ephesi (talk) 10:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Laodicea on the Lycus into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:34, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Copy that, thanks @Whpq! Marchio Ephesi (talk) 16:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

 * thank you! Marchio Ephesi (talk) 08:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Advice
Hello, Marchio Ephesi,

I was just going to suggest that the only way that these articles are going to survive, giving how the AFD discussions are going, are for you to request them be "Draftified" or moved to Draft space or moved to your User space. This won't completely prevent them from being deleted if that's what the consensus is but if you want to continue to work on them, they have a better chance to exist in Draft or User space than main space of the project. Liz Read! Talk! 06:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Liz absolutely, that'd be far better than complete deletion. I'll work on collecting permissions and sources, meantime. Thanks! Marchio Ephesi (talk) 16:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC)