User talk:Marchjuly/Archives/2015/March

Disambiguation link notification for March 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Peter Hillary
 * added links pointing to National Geographic and Doubleday


 * Bob Odenkirk
 * added a link pointing to Variety

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Rosie at helstonmuseum
I just noticed that you left a warning to them the other day because of their username. It's not really a problem because they have got a new name, User:Rosiecornwall, but according to Username policy that particular style of username is permitted and was in the warning you left them: "However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87"." Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:37, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi . Thanks for the post. I am aware of the policy, but you seem not to have looked very closey at what actually happened. That particular editor's user name was "Helstonmuseum" when I added the warning to their talk page. If you carefully read my post at User talk:Rosie at helstonmuseum, you'll see this. They then tried to change their name to "Rosie@Helstonmuseum" at Changing username/Simple/Archive182, but were told here by that they couldn't. Eventually, they were blocked here by  for having an inappropriate username. Their user name was then changed to "Rosie at Helstonmuseum" after the fact with  by . Both Rjd600 and Xeno are administrators and K6ka is also an experienced editor so I'm pretty sure that one of them would have let me know if my warning was a mistake. - Marchjuly (talk) 13:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Just chirping in to say that, from what I can see, the warning was issued before the user was renamed to their current name, so I don't see it as an issue. --I am  k6ka  Talk to me!   See what I have done  13:42, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * You are both absolutely right. I completely missed that. My apologies for the screw up. I've struck out the original remarks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:25, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * No worries CambridgeBayWeather. I took a double dose of my "oversensitive and defensive pills" today which has me a little on edge. Thanks for the "strike out". - Marchjuly (talk) 15:02, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Melissa McBride, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Melissa McBride article
Hello, I have tried to discuss my edits on the Melissa McBride article's talk page, but user Alrofficial has reverted them three times within 24 hours without discussion, which is supposed to result in a user being blocked from editing. I had signed my original "SOS..." post, but it must have been unintentionally deleted by a subsequent edit. I had originally removed the IMDB link because that website is notoriously inaccurate and manipulated by fraudulent fan voting. I had understood that there is a difference between listing an external link versus a source, but extrapolated that Wiki's rejection of a website as the former equated to its likewise dismissal as the latter. A quick search reveals that Wiki inexplicably approves of such a questionable external link under the referenced circumstances, so I stand corrected. Further, I did not deliberately remove any images; I apologize if I did. As the main article appears now, the syntax, semantics and morphology would shame any grade school grammar student, as I have previously noted. Would you be so kind as to correct the grammar yourself or simply revert the page to my last edits (with your objections excepted)?--PhiladelphiaInjustice (talk) 12:18, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I see you've posted the same at Talk:Melissa McBride so I reply there. - Marchjuly (talk) 12:25, 23 March 2015 (UTC)