User talk:Marclijour

Welcome!
Hello, Marclijour, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Blythwood (talk) 21:55, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Savoir-faire Linux article
Hello, thanks for writing this article! I’ve just read it and I’m a bit concerned that it has no citations to sources like news articles. That worries me since without proof that this company is notable, meaning covered enough in media to write a fair article on it, the article may get deleted.

Are there any reliable sources (ones not written by or for this company) you can add? If so just edit the article and add citations using the cite tool, or if you have any thoughts or questions just let me know. Blythwood (talk) 21:56, 15 August 2016 (UTC) I added references, hopefully making the case for originality. Savoir-faire Linux was most probably the first company to sue the Quebec government for non-competitive practice because it disregarded Free Software, and it won in Quebec Superior Court. The trial was the first to be live-tweeted in Quebec. It lead to Quebec favouring Free Software (by the word of the President of the Treasury Board) and to Bill 133. To this date I don't know any other company in Canada that occupies the same niche, not even counting the leadership for the cause of Free Software. Is that enough references to make the case for not deleting the article? I'm hoping I can pause and get back to it later. Marclijour (talk) 23:50, 15 August 2016 (UTC)